PC 012600 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner Sullivan noted that the plan as proposed does not benefit the City and /"" Community. He noted that the size of the project will generate additional traffic and may bring a small number of jobs to residents. He noted that historically a small percentage of residents work in Pleasanton and that it would increase cut-through traffic from easterly cities. He stated that he would not be in favor of having additional traffic on Sunol Boulevard during peak hours, citing the present traffic problems on Sunol Boulevard. He stated he would be in favor of exploring housing options for this site and noted that the City is running out of options for affordable housing due to build-out. He noted he would be in support of mixed-use opportunities on site, which would allow people to walk to work and shopping and potentially to relocate an ACE station on the San Francisco property. He stated that there are still unresolved issues with contamination on the site and remediation efforts. Commissioner Sullivan provided an amendment to the motion that the Housing Commission work closely with the Planning Commission on the project, with possibly a workshop being conducted to discuss possibilities for this site, and provide a joint recommendation to the City Council. Commissioner Maas spoke in favor of the Commission not revisiting this item but forwarding this item to the City Council. r- Chairperson Roberts noted she is in opposition to any housing being developed on site. She noted this site is adjacent to two industrial sites. She noted this site will allow for workers to be provided access to a business off of Interstate 680 and that there is no way to enforce the businesses at this site to hire Pleasanton residents. She agreed that there are cut-through problems on First Street; however, she noted that the General Plan does not allow for widening in the Downtown area. She noted that traffic lights in the area will ameliorate some of the traffic issues. She reminded the Commission that this site has always been used as a business park. She noted she would consider reducing the square footage of the proposed project to the median in the General Plan. She stated that affordable housing is needed in the City; however, most of the City's current affordable housing is located within a few blocks of this site. He added that affordable housing may be utilized on the San Francisco Bernal property site. She expressed concern with the traffic in this area and suggested that the residents on Sunol Boulevard discuss with staff the possibility of installing a sound wall or additional landscaping to address noise issues. In conclusion, she noted that she would not be supporting the motion due to affordable housing not being appropriate on this site. Commissioner Maas noted that the Commissioners should take into consideration the statements from the members of the Housing Commission. ~ Commissioner Kameny noted his admiration for Kaiser for the attractive plan. He noted that traffic in the area is an issue; however, he noted that employees from the Silicon Valley will probably not commute to Pleasanton and that the majority of this project's employees will be from cities in the valley and who will cut through Downtown Pleasanton. He noted he could support the project if the road improvements are performed at one time. He stated that the proposed project increases office space by 775,000 square feet and that by working with the planner, there could be ways in which to mitigate housing on this site, if the toxic issue can be resolved with the State. He commented on a recent article in The Tri-Valley Herald entitled PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 26, 2000 Page 7