Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Shelley Cartier, 4444 First Street, Housing Commission, expressed concern with the project's <br />,,-... impact on traffic on First Street and she noted that this location is not conducive to a business <br />park. Further, she commented on the lack of affordable housing in Pleasanton for people who <br />work in the City. She requested that the Commission work with the Housing Commission on <br />planning and examining issues relating to providing more mediwn-priced housing in Pleasanton. <br /> <br />Mr. Ellman noted that the applicant has no bias to affordable housing. He noted that the site has <br />been zoned for an office and industrial parkand is reflective of the City's General Plan. He <br />noted that Kaiser has determined the best use for the site is a single campus user and noted the <br />importance of moving forward to locate a purchaser for the site. He noted there has not been any <br />interest for housing on this site by purchasers and that affordable housing will require a General <br />Plan amendment. He stated that Kaiser has no interest in the outcome of the property; however, <br />the Commission should be aware of opportunities that could be lost in the meantime. He noted it <br />would be inappropriate to delay the project for consideration of a General Plan amendment. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued relating to what the General Plan process will entail, the impacts of selling the <br />property as is, remediation of soil on site, and traffic studies that have been conducted. <br /> <br />Hans Corbett, traffic engineer, provided an overview of traffic studies that have been conducted. <br /> <br />r" <br /> <br />Joe Decredico, 1045 Sansome Street, noted this site is not appropriate for affordable housing due <br />to impacts from noise levels and the quality of life for residents due to two commercial users <br />that are adjacent to the site. He stated there is a creative opportunity for affordable housing in <br />the downtown area for mixed-use development. <br /> <br />Mr. Cordtz noted that there is a deed restriction on the site prohibiting residential development <br />due to soil and ground water contamination and that Kaiser is remediating the site to comply <br />with industrial cleanup. <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> <br />Commissioner Maas moved that Case PUD-98-07 be approved subject to the condition shown in <br />Exhibit B; that the loop trail be made public and that the facility issue identification cards to be <br />provided to interested residents; that the concept of an employee-based campus!daycare facility <br />and campus! corporate based living facility be strongly studied and considered by the City <br />Council; that the Housing Commission present formal findings, with its recommendations, to the <br />City Council; that development be phased, to allow concerns, especially traffic, to be addressed <br />and mitigated; that there be perimeter landscaping, with care and emphasis on the Sunol <br />Boulevard visual side; that trees be planted at project approval so the 24-inch trees be given a <br />headstart in the overall landscaping effect and to assist residents with the visual and noise issues <br />during construction; and that computer-generated visuals from Interstate 680 be provided for the <br />City Council's perusal. <br /> <br />Chairperson Roberts noted that road work should not be phased. <br /> <br />r" <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES <br /> <br />January 26, 2000 <br /> <br />Page 6 <br />