PC 012600 - Laserfiche WebLink

, Chairperson Roberts requested that on page 14, middle paragraph, be amended to read"... to r- relocate to Pleasanton to purchase the property; that no lakeside development, except for accessory structures be allowed; that loop trail ...." Commissioner Maas noted she would like to make an amendment to the minutes of December 8, 1999, first page, last sentence, "Commissioner Maas noted she would desire the potential uses of the San Francisco Bernal property to include lighted sport fields and some type of water element. such as boat rentals. " The January 12, 2000, Planning Commission minutes were approved, as amended. 3. MEETING OPEN FOR ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON ANY ITEM WHICH IS NOT ALREADY ON THE AGENDA There were none. 4. REVISIONS AND OMISSIONS TO TIlE AGENDA Mr. Plucker stated that Item No. 6F, 6G and 6H will be continued to the February 9, 2000, meeting, as referenced in the agenda. On Commission consensus, it was unanimously ordered that the agenda be taken out of order. r 5. MATTERS CONTINUED FOR DECISION There were none. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS b. PUD-98-07. Kaiser AluminuDl and Chemical COrDoration Application for a Planned Unit Development approval for a master plan and design guidelines that would allow for the development of up to 1.1 million square feet of office/research and development buildings located at 6177 Sunol Boulevard. Zoning for the property is PUD (planned Unit Development) - I (Industrial) District. The Planning Commission will also consider the negative declaration prepared for the project. I""' Mr. Plucker referenced a staff report dated January 20, 2000 and highlighted key areas contained in the report including public notice and revised conditions. He noted that the Commission's options include adopting a resolution recommending approval of Case PUD-98-07 to the City Council, subject to the revised conditions shown in Exhibit B, if the Commission believes that the proposed land use, PUD master plan, and design guidelines are appropriate for the site; denying the application and directing staff to initiate a General Plan amendment of the property to allow a mixed-use residential/commercial/office development, if the Commission believes that a mixed-use residential/commercial/office development is the appropriate land use for the site; or, denying the application and directing staff to initiate a General Plan amendment of the PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 26, 2000 Page 2