PC 2000-68 - Laserfiche WebLink

Resolution No. PC-2000-68 Page 14 The City shall then use these funds to install the Bemal Avenue waterline-loop from Valley Avenue to Pleasanton Avenue in a time and manner determined by the City to provide the required redundant water system loop serving the development. Upon completion and operation of the 16" waterline connection by the developer in the undercrossing improvements, the City shall reimburse to the developer the Equivalem Value. e. Due to uncertainties of future water service needs, the City prefers to defer the Bemal Avenue loop connection and the developer shall use its best efforts in building the cross-country eonneetion within the specified deadline. 69. The developer and the City shall work together in realigning Street A in order to increase the amount of land between Street A and the 1-680 fight-of-way. Any such realignment shall take into consideration the impact that the street realignment would have on any arohaeologieal resources and noise berming requirements. Final alignment shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval. 70. If the East Area altemate lotting plan shown on Sheet 5A is developed, the design of the sound-berm between Io680 and the residential lots adjacent to the freeway shall be consistent with the requirements of the PUD development plan. 71. As part of the final grading plan, the grading of the individual lots shall be submitted for the review and approval of the Planning Director and City Engineer. Any retaining walls shall be of CMU block or concrete construction and they shall be held to the lowest height possible. 72. The streeflights for the residential developments shall substantially match the design of the cut-sheet submitted as part of the tentative map application. The color of the streetlights and standards shall be black. 73. Prior to final map approval for the East Area development, the specific details of the soundwall and associated landscaping shall be submitted to the Planning Director for review and approval. The sound mitigation requirements detailed in the Charles Salter report, dated December 8, 2000, shall be included in the final map improvement plans and building permits for the future homes. The developer may submit alternate noise mitigation design measures to the Planning Director for review and consideration. The Planning Director may approve such alternate measures if it is found that the measures meet the General Plan noise requirements and that they are substantially consistent with this approval. 74. Should the East Area alternative shown on Sheet 5A of the tentative map be developed, Lots 295 and 360 shall become four duet unit lots consistent with the PUD development plan.