My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 74024
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1970-1979
>
1974
>
RES 74024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2001 7:55:38 PM
Creation date
1/18/2001 9:49:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/11/1974
DOCUMENT NO
RES 74024
NOTES
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT GUIDELINES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(e) <br /> <br />(f) <br /> <br />(g) <br /> <br />design er mitigatien measures which ceuld be incerpera- <br />ted inte'the preJect te further mlniml'~a~significant <br />envirenmental impact (that havenet~been discussed under <br />item (c) ~beve), and the reasen these have net been <br />included. This examinatien sheuld alse include recem- <br />mendatiens that censider "eff-site" alternative features <br />er designs as they ceuld affect the envirenmental impact <br />ef the prepesed preJect. Include in this dlscusslen <br />alternatives capable ef substantially reducinger elim- <br />inating any adverse impacts, even if these alternatives <br />substantially reduce the preJect ebJectives and are mere <br />cestly. <br /> <br />The Relatienship Between Lecal Shert-Term Uses ef <br />Man's EnVlrenment and the Maintenance and' Enhancement <br /> <br /> cumulative and leng-term effects ef the <br />prepesed preJect which adversely affect the state ef <br />the envirenment. In particular, the desirability ef <br />the preJect shall be weighed te ~uard a~ainst shert- <br />sighted fereclesure ef future eptiens er needs. Special <br />attentien shall be ~iven te impacts which narrew the <br />range ef beneficial uses ef the envirenment er pese <br />leng-term risks te health er safety. In additien, <br />the reasens why the prepesed preJect is believed by the <br />Spenser te be Justified new, rather than reserving an <br />eptten fer further alternatives, sheuld be explained. <br /> <br />Any Irreversible Envirenmental Chanes Which Weuld <br />Be Invelved in the Pre~esed AOtien~euld it b~ <br />Implemented: <br />Rescribe the extent te which the prepesed preJect cur- <br />'tails er expands the diversity and range ef ~eneficial <br />uses ef the envirenment. Uses ef hen-renewable reseurces <br />during the initial. and centinued phases ef the preJect <br />may be irreversible since a large cemmitment ef Such <br />res®urces makes remeval er hen-use thereafter unlikely. <br />.Primary impacts and, particularly, secen~ary impacts ~ <br /> (such as a highway, imprevement which preyides access <br /> tea nen-accessible area) ~enerally cemmit future gener- <br /> atiens te similar uses. Alse irreversible damage can <br /> result frem enVirenmental accidents asseciate~ with <br /> the preJect, Irretrievable cemmitments ef reseurces <br /> sheuld be evaluated te assure that such current cen- <br /> sumptien is Justified. <br /> <br />Discuss the ways in which the p J ld <br />fester'ecenemic er pepulatien grewth, either directly <br />er indirectly,' in the surreunding envirenment. In, <br />cluded in this are preJects which weuld remeve <br />ebstacles te pepulatien grewth (a maJer expansien ef <br />a waste water treatment plant might, fer example, <br />allew fer mere censtructien in service areas). in- <br /> <br />-22- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.