Laserfiche WebLink
and a copy of a draft environmental impact report <br />which had been prepared by the developer and sub- <br />mitted at the time of filing of developer's tentative <br />map on January 7, 19'75. <br />NOG~I, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUiVCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASAtQTON DOES <br />RESOLVE AS FOLLOWSe <br />Section_1. The appeal of Dr. Howard Long of the Planning Com- <br />mission decision set forth in Planning Commission <br />Resolution No. 1332 and relating to Tentative .dap No. <br />3256 is denied. <br />Section 2. The bases for this denial are as follows: <br />1. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66473, the <br />City Council is required to disapprove a map which <br />fails to meet or perform any of the requirersents <br />or conditions imposed by the State Subdivision <br />Map Act, or local ordinances enacted by the City <br />of Pleasanton pursuant to the State Subdivision <br />Map Act. The City Council specifically finds that <br />the proposed ten lot subdivision is to be served <br />by a paved private street and, in addition, not <br />all parcels of property to be located within the <br />subdivision abut said paved private street. Sec- <br />tion 2-3.40 of the Ordinance Code of the City of <br />Pleasanton specifically requires all lots or <br />parcels created by a subdivision to have access <br />to a public street constructed pursuant to the <br />standards established in the Subdivision Ordin- <br />ance of the City of Pleasanton. Section 2-3.33, <br />Article 7, Title II of the Ordinance Code of the <br />City of Pleasanton allocas for modification by <br />tYie Planning Commission of the standards set forth <br />in the afore--mentioned ordinance, including access <br />to public streets. However, neither the developer <br />°2 _ <br />