Laserfiche WebLink
WHEPd~AS , <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />WHEREAS <br /> <br />after reviewing all viable alternatives available to <br />the City, Kennedy Engineers indicated that the two <br />alternatives which were most viable were projects 2-b <br />(construction of an interceptor sewer line to take <br />sewage from the existing sewage treatment line to <br />take sewage from the existing sewage treatment plant <br />to V.C.S.D.'s plant), and 5-b (the construction of a <br />new waste water treatment plant to replace the existing <br />Sunol Treatment Plant); and <br />the City Council, at its meeting of October 30, 1974, <br />considered the reports of Kennedy Engineers and the <br />various alternatives discussed in said reports and <br />indicated that alternative 2-b was deemed to be the <br />best apparent project and requested State funding of <br />said project subject to a variety of conditions re- <br />lating to expansion of and the exercise of powers ever <br />the Valley Community Services District plant, and in- <br />dicated if alternative 2-b could not be accomplished, <br />then, the City Council retained its option to request <br />funding from the State to pursue alternative 5-b (a <br />copy of Resolution No. 74-212 is attached hereto and <br />incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A); and <br />on April 14, 1975, the City Council adopted Resolution <br />No. 75-74, reiterating that alternatives 2-b and 5-b <br />represented the most feasible methods by which the City <br />could meet the water quality objectives of the State <br />Water Resources Control Board and the Regional Water <br />Quality Control, San Francisco Bay Area (a copy of said <br />Resolution No. 75-74 is attached as Exhibit B and incor- <br />porated herein be reference); and <br /> <br /> <br />