Laserfiche WebLink
deliberated upon the information received at the public <br />hearing together with the staff report of January 6, <br />1977 prepared by the Director of Planning and attach- <br />ments thereto. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON DOES <br />RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br />Section 1. Upholds the appeal of Charlotte Witke and Kay Martin <br /> to a decision of the Planning Commission approving the <br /> UP-76-31 which would have allowed the use of 1.8 acres <br /> of P (Public and Institutional) zoning to be used as <br /> parking for a shopping center to be developed on an <br /> adjoining 3.6 acres of C-C (Central Commercial) District <br /> zoning for the following reasons: <br /> <br /> 1. Therewas insufficient evidence presented to the City <br /> Council to indicate that the objectives of Section <br /> 2-5.01 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Pleasan- <br /> ton would be met by allowing the development of the <br /> P zoned property as a parking lot to serve the ad- <br /> jacent C-C property. The evidence presented by the <br /> appellants indicated that the use of the P property <br /> for parking would not establish and foster a har- <br /> mOniOuS, convenient and workable relationship be- <br /> tween land uses since the parking would be adjacent <br /> to the residentially zoned property immediately to <br /> the east of the proposed C-C and P properties. The <br /> evidence indicated that the development could occur <br /> on the C-C zone by a reduction of the uses to be <br /> placed in the C-C zone by the developer so that all <br /> <br />-2- <br /> <br /> <br />