RES 77010 - Laserfiche WebLink

parking could be accommodated on the C-C zone properties without the use of the P property, thus preventing an impingement of parking immediate- ly adjacent to the residentially zoned properties to the east. Such action would better protect and enhance real property values than allowing the P zoning to be used for parking. In addition, the prevention of the use of the P zoning property for parking to accommodate the C-C properties, would prevent an over crowding of the C-C property with structures and the limitation of the development of the C-C properties to the 3.8 acres zoned for Cen- tral Commercial uses would insure that the residen- tial properties, located adjacent to this area, as well as the property in question would be used for purposes which are most appropriate and beneficial to the City as a whole. 2. The evidence presented by the appellants indi- cated that the Public Health, Safety and Welfare would be served to a greater extent by not allowing the use of the P zone property for parking to serve the adjacent C-C zoned land. It was the opinion of the City Council that the use of the P zoned proper- ties for parking to serve the adjacent C-C zoned properties would be detrimental to the Public Health, Safety and Welfare and materially injurious to the properties or improvements of the adjacent neighbor- ing residences for the reasons stated in Finding 1. above. In addition, the elimination of the use of -3-