Laserfiche WebLink
concluded that a City official has come out to his residence to document the fact that the <br />wall was installed as the permit stated at the time it was issued. <br />Commissioner Fox addressed Mr. Jeffrey and noted that the City of Pleasanton had <br />informed him on January 25, 2008 to cease work. She asked him when he was told to <br />continue work and by whom. Mr. Jeffrey replied that approximately two to three weeks <br />after that, he was contacted by the project planner that he could continue to do work. <br />Ms. Amos confirmed that Mr. Iserson had contacted all the parties, including the <br />applicant, to let them know that an agreement had been reached and that Mr. Jeffrey <br />could move forward with the pool permits. <br />In response to Commissioner Fox's inquiry regarding what the applicant was told about <br />the rest of the backyard work, Ms. Amos replied that work in the backyard, including the <br />retaining wall, was part of the approval that was given to him in December 2007. <br />Commissioner Fox asked Mr. Jeffrey if he had a copy of the CC&R's before he applied <br />for his permits. Mr. Jeffrey replied that he did not and that he did not know they even <br />existed. <br />Chair Blank inquired if he received a copy of the CC&R's when he purchased his home. <br />Mr. Jeffrey replied that he was not aware of that. <br />Commissioner Fox asked Mr. Jeffrey if his contractor did not know about the CC&R's <br />when he pulled the permits. Mr. Jeffrey replied that he had a licensed contractor but <br />that his first knowledge of the CC&R's was when Mr. Wickboldt showed up at his home <br />and told him there were issues with his work. He added that Mr. Wickboldt asked him to <br />"hold tight" and they would try to resolve the problem. He stated that he asked <br />Mr. Wickboldt for a copy of the CC&R's, which Mr. Wickboldt dropped off at his doorstep <br />two days later. <br />In response to Commissioner Narum's question regarding the distance from the fence <br />line to the wall, Mr. Jeffrey replied that the distance between the property line and the <br />wall is 15 feet, which is the mandatory easement. Commissioner Narum stated that she <br />thought the wall had been moved in from where the original fence had been, and Mr. <br />Jeffrey replied that the original fence was probably a foot higher than the base of the <br />retaining wall. Ms. Amos verified that a Building Inspector had measured the distance <br />and indicated that the existing redwood fence then was about seven to eight feet from <br />the property line; the applicant had moved the fence back to maintain the 15-foot <br />easement required in that area. <br />Commissioner Narum inquired if the landscaping in the backyard was complete. <br />Mr. Jeffrey replied that more landscaping was proposed, but he did not have additional <br />money to spend at this time. He indicated that the intent is that in approximately one <br />year, the plantings there will grow in. He stated that he had switched a lot of the <br />vegetation from his original plan listed in Exhibit A to these different fast-growing <br />varieties of shrubs and trees in order to meet the neighbors' needs as well as his own. <br />EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 10, 2008 Page 13 of 25 <br />