My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18 ATTACHMENT 13
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
011508
>
18 ATTACHMENT 13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2008 3:38:31 PM
Creation date
1/10/2008 3:28:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
1/15/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
18 ATTACHMENT 13
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chickens are routine animals when it comes to the egg producing process; these hens lay their <br />eggs between 9 and 11 in the morning. They also prefer moderate temperature; therefore they <br />seek out shade at the hottest points of the day. Additionally, the hens sleep during the night and <br />are in their coop shortly after sunset. <br />Noise readings <br />Staff conducted noise reading of the hens by using an altimeter, which is an electronic devise <br />that reads noise levels. During the site visit staff took four noise readings. The first noise <br />reading was to get a base reading without chicken or other distinguishing noises, such as the <br />wind chimes, which hang in the rear yard. This reading produced a dBA (decibels, A-level) of <br />49. The second noise reading was taken with a normal tone conversation of two people; this <br />reading was approximately 55 dBA (dependent on the speaker). The third noise reading was <br />taken with the conversation and the wind chime music, resulting in a 68 dBA when standing at <br />the location of the chicken coop. The final noise reading was taken of the chickens. Though the <br />chickens were not audible for most of the visit, they made a minimal level of noise when staff <br />prodded at the chickens to obtain a recordable noise reading that exceeded the base readings. <br />Prodding involved handling the chickens and causing them to be nervous, which resulted in a <br />squawking of sorts. These noises registered a 63 dBA when standing two feet away from the <br />origin of the noise. At the property line, approximately 9 feet away, the noises would not <br />register. <br />The PMC limits the daytime dBA to no greater then 60 dBA at the property line and exempts <br />noises during the day up to 70dBA. Staff feels that the noise readings not only show that the <br />dBAs are within the maximums allowed at the property line, but they are also less then a normal <br />volume conversation. Staff believes that the cackling of the chickens will not be a <br />distinguishable or disturbing noise and is within the limits as set by the Municipal Code <br />V. PUBLIC NOTICE <br />Staff sent notices of the Planning Commission's public hearing on this item to all property <br />owners and residents located within 1,000-feet of the subject property. <br />VI. PUBLIC CORRESPONDENCE <br />At the time this staff report was written, six comments from a neighbors regarding the project. <br />Staff received two (2) a-mails stating concerns about the project, one (1) phone call with general <br />questions, one (1) a-mail containing information about a concern being resolved, and three (3) e- <br />mails stating support of the request and a desire to see a different process for such an <br />application. <br />One of the a-mail of concern inquires into the impacts on the public park, which is in close <br />proximity to the project site. Staff was informed by the Parks and Recreation Department that <br />they do not have concerns regarding the chicken use permit. <br />Case No. PAUP-2 Planning Commission <br />Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.