CCMIN101999 - Laserfiche WebLink

concerned that if this is approved and the developer does not build the infrastructure? Them will be an armexation vote on November 16 and he has to know how to vote. He has no objection to any of the proposed developments. He supported the TTK application and the Spotorno proposal. He just wanted to know that any property with access to Alisal Street is on the larger lots. He asked if it were possible to postpone the annexation election. Mayor Tarver stated Council needs to decide whether to add a condition that the annexation has to be approved to make the PUD approvals valid. Council has not gotten to that point yet. Mr. Barlow was concerned that he would not know how to vote on annexation unless he gets sewer and water guaranteed. Ms. Ayala asked if he was aware of the Black Mountain proposal. Ms. Michelotti clarified that all the development agreements on the agenda were the same, but in the last few days there was a new proposal by Black Mountain Development that if one of the proposed developments was not approved, Black Mountain would make up the difference for the infrastructure costs. Mayor Tarver indicated staff and the Planning Commission did not recommend approval of the Summerhill project and without it there will be no bypass road, but there will be sewer and water infrastructure. Stan Erickson, 3684 Chillingham Court, reminded Council that during the General Plan Steering Committee meetings, the Spotomo property was the most contentious item of discussion. The particular point was that this property would be a gateway of development for lands further from the freeway. The decision was made that development on this property would be positioned in such a way that this would be a "cork in the bottle" to prevent further development. Mr. Bates hoped Council would not just dismiss this application. The developer knows the land and knows its problems. He is willing to take on these issues and if you want the bypass road, these issues must be met by someone. He encouraged Council, if it cannot approve the project before it, to work with the developer to bring back a plan that will work. Owen Pole, 151 Spyrock Court, Walnut Creek, indicated he had been involved in this project for the last four years and has watched the process on the golf course. There is a lot of discussion of rural atmosphere in this area. The reality is we are talking about a golf course with 75,000 rounds of golf a year. This is a manicured open space between the City and the Spotomo agricultural space. We are talking about an amenity for the City and golfers need to get to the golf course by a road. The best allocation of costs would be by trip generation. The City is in a fortunate position because it has a developer willing to pay for that and if you don't consider the whole package, and then try to put in 22 10/19/99 Pleasanton City Council Minutes