CCMIN040571 - Laserfiche WebLink

3S;7 incorporated, to the extent legally feasible, in the general plans of the Cities and County. 2. That the Valley Planning Conun. ission be additionally requested to develop ceilings or levels for industrial and commercial development consistent with the air quality standards Ilere- inabove developed said levels to be like~ise included, to the extent legally ~e-.q'~able, as an element in the general plans of the Cities and of the County. It vyas moved by Councilman Gerton and seconded by Councilman Spilio- topoulos that Resolution No. 71-71, regarding smog control in the Livermore-Amador Valley, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmen Beratlis, Gerton, Pearson, Spiliotopoulos and NOES: None Mayor Reid ABSE~T: None Further discussion and decision regardin.g supervisorial redistrict- ihg witt{i~' Alameda County ............. After some discussion on this matter, it was moved by Hayor Reid and seconded by Councilman Spiliotopoulos that Resolution No. 71-72, advising the Alameda County Board of Supervisors that the City Council of the City of Pleasanton is desirous of having all of t~e Livermore-~mador Valley jurisdictions v~ithin a single supervisorial district and that the population within said Livermore-Amador Valley represent at least 50% of the population of the supervisorial district, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmen Beratlis, Gerton, Pearson, Spiliotopoulos and NOES: None Mayor Reid ~j3SENT: None PLEETING OPEN TO THE PUBLIC Mrs. Judy itanhy, 4916 Canary, again asked the City Council for increased enforcement of the speed limits on Valley and Black Avenues. Mr. Fales reported that an up-dated report on the traffic situation would be presented at the next Council meeting. SPECIAL REPORTS There were no special reports presented at this meeting. PdZPORTS OF BOARDS A~ND CO.~4ISSIONS There were no reports from Boards and Commissions. REPORTS OF TItE CITY MAHAGER Report of the City .Manager Re: Extension of the franchise for refuse collection with Pleasanton Garbage Service. Mr. Fales stated that a report was submitted to the City Council on January 11, 1971 and after the City Council considered that report, tile staff v~as asked to consider, together with the Pleasanton Garbage 7. 4-5-71