Laserfiche WebLink
257 <br /> <br /> It was moved by Ms. Mohr, and seconded by Mr. Tarver, that <br />Resolution No. 89-355 be adopted, approving the application of Ray <br />Seronello for proposed regrading on a vacant single-family lot <br />located at 3088 Crestablanca Drive. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Mohr and Tarver <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: Councilmember Butler and Mayor Mercer <br /> <br />Item 6c <br />AP-89-11, City Council appeal of a Decision of the Board of <br />Adjustment which approved Case V-89-11, the Application of Rich <br />Collins for a variance from the Municipal Code to allow retention <br />of a trellis structure that will encroach into the required side <br />and rear yard setback located at 1036 Bartlett Place <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift presented his report (SR 89:365) regarding the <br />matter. <br /> <br /> Mr. Mercer declared the public hearing open on the <br />application. <br /> <br /> Mr. Rich Collins, 1036 Bartlett Place, stated that his <br />neighbors had signed a letter indicating that the trellis <br />structure would help the condition of his backyard, considering <br />the extreme differences in property elevations. He added that his <br />application was approved by the Board of Adjustment at its <br />June 28, 1989 meeting and that a letter from the Planning <br />Department confirmed its approval, effective July 13th at 5:00 <br />p.m. unless appealed before then, subject to the conditions <br />mentioned in the staff report. The appeal was made on July 18th. <br /> <br /> Mr. Mercer explained that reports of the actions taken by the <br />various City Boards and Commissions at their sessions come before <br />the City Council at its next meeting. The Councilmembers can <br />appeal any of the decisions in those reports, and Mr. Brandes <br />appealed this case when it came up at the July 18th meeting. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr mentioned that there was no Council meeting on the <br />first week of July, which would have been the meeting immediately <br />following the June 28th Board of Adjustment meeting. This was the <br />reason why the item was brought up on the July 18th meeting <br />instead and appealed then. <br /> <br /> Mr. Brandes stated that he generally appeals Board and <br />Commission decisions that differ from staff recommendations. <br /> <br /> Mr. Collins commented that some members of the Board of <br />Adjustment made a physical visit to his home and found merit in <br />his application. <br /> <br /> -9- <br /> <br /> 8-15-89 <br /> <br /> <br />