Laserfiche WebLink
8] <br /> <br />13. REPORTS OF THE CITY ATTORNEY <br /> <br /> No reports were presented by the City Attorney at this <br />meeting. <br /> <br />14. COMMUNICATIONS <br /> No communications were presented at this meeting. <br /> <br />15. CITY COUNCIL CALENDAR <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta presented the City Council Calendar for the <br />information of the Councilmembers. <br /> <br /> Mr. Brandes stated that it did not appear appropriate that, as <br />has been the practice in the past, newly elected City officials <br />were sworn in during a regular City Council meeting. He suggested <br />that a separate night be set aside solely for the purpose of <br />swearing in the officials. He then inquired when the Registrar of <br />Voters would be ready with the certified election results. <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta replied that the Registrar of Voters has 30 days to <br />prepare the certification and that it would be unlikely that the <br />certified results would be ready by the November 20th City Council <br />Meeting. <br /> <br />16. CLOSED SESSION <br /> <br /> Council adjourned to a Closed Session at 9:55 p.m. to discuss <br />Alameda County Litigation (King Plan), Potential Litigation Against <br />Amador Valley Savings & Loan, et al., and Potential Litigation <br />Against Southern Pacific Railroad, et al. <br /> <br />17. ADJOURNMENT <br /> <br /> There being no further business at 10:15 p.m., it was moved by <br />Mr. Butler, and seconded by Ms. Mohr, that the meeting be <br />adjourned, to meet again in Regular Session on Tuesday, November 6, <br />1990, at 7:30 p.m., in the City Council Chambers. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr, Tarver and Mayor <br /> Mercer <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br />PEGGYJLY~FZfDRO,~ITY CLERK <br /> <br /> 10-16-90 <br /> - 25 - <br /> <br /> <br />