Laserfiche WebLink
how active and busy it is. People make lunch dates for downtown and while there they do their <br />banking at the same time. As long as the business is there, the banks will stay. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis commented that she normally uses the ATM for her transactions and that the <br />insides of the banks are often empty. It seemed to her that the banks would want to be close <br />to their customers and convenient to shoppers. For that reason she assumed a certain number <br />of banks will stay downtown. She felt downtown did not need eight banks. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarvex liked the concept of making it mandatory for four banks even though there <br />are five banks now. If one wants to move out, the vitality of the area can still be checked on <br />to see if it grows and see if other retail goes in downtown. If Council reduces the number to <br />four banks, one bank has the option to move out. He wants to have a mechanism to control all <br />the banks from fleeing. It would be nice to have the discretion to reduce the number and <br />continue to reduce it until the market has totally taken over. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico felt the ordinance was outdated and felt the nature of financial institutions is <br />changing as quickly as technology today. The old ordinance was unenforceable and not <br />workable. When there are five banks downtown and the City has an ordinance that says eight <br />but there are banks popping up all over the City, he felt Council is not able to limit or restrict <br />the banks. He did not see a problem approving staffs recommendation. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver asked staff if a financial institution had been allowed to locate outside the <br />downtown area or was it a branch of an existing bank. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift stated that in the Stoneridge Mall area the banks have been exempt. When the <br />requirement was put in to have eight banks downtown, there were a host of financial institutions <br />that came into various areas with use permits which was in accordance with the policy at that <br />time. Since that time, there have been no use permits approved and there is at least one <br />glorified ATM as part of a grocery store that is open for business that has essentially been <br />waiting for the City Council to address this issue before any enforcement action was taken. He <br />is not aware of a bank or f'mancial institution locating outside the downtown area contrary to the <br />policy. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked about the change in the staff report from the time it was started to <br />now. Has it changed because staff feels it was following the market rather than treating a <br />situation that is in existence! <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift stated that the Bank of Walnut Creek did come to downWwn even though it <br /> had other options. Staff feels that some of the downtown banks are so well-anchored in that <br /> location that they won't leave for many years. There has been difficulty in defining what a <br /> financial institution is, rather than just a bank or savings and loan institution. Several downtown <br /> financial institutions have indicated that it wasn't necessarily fair to them if they had to stay <br /> downtown. The situation exists that if four or five banks were required for the downtown they <br /> would have to stay but other banks could come into other areas of the City but none of the <br /> <br />11/21/95 -5- <br /> <br /> <br />