Laserfiche WebLink
It was moved by Ms. Michelotti, seconded by Ms. Dennis, to adopt Resolution 95-23, <br />approving a 50% credit for park dedication fees. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers - Dennis, Michelotti, and Mohr <br />NOES: Councilmember Pico and Mayor Tarver <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br /> Due to the lateness of the hour, it was necessary to vote on whether to continue with the <br />agenda. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Ms. Michelotti, seconded by Ms. Mohr, to continue the meeting and <br />hear items 7i, 7j, 7k, and 71. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councihnembers - Dennis, Michelotti, and Mohr <br />NOES: Councihnember Pico and Mayor Tarver <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br />Item 7i <br />Report Regarding General Plan Process (SR95:61) <br /> <br /> Brian Swift presented the staff report. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked when a joint session with the Planning Commission and Steering <br />Committee will occur. She had understood that before final recommendations are made that <br />there would be a joint workshop with the Planning Commission and Steering Committee. <br /> <br /> Ms. Swift explained there are no joint sessions planned. It was determined early on that <br />the Planning Commission preferred addressing the issue without the influence of the Council. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked if there were to be any preliminary discussions with the Steering <br />Committee prior to Council receiving the final recommendations? <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift indicated Council will receive the final recommendations as a regular agenda <br />item and a presentation will be made. The City Council would then review those <br />recommendations and indicate to staff any recommendations or alternatives that it would like <br />included in the draft EIR, which happens parallel with the Planning Commission actions. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr asked what happens if Council determines that something is missing and needs <br />to be sent back for more analysis? <br /> <br />02/21/95 <br /> - 24 - <br /> <br /> <br />