My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 97089
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
RES 97089
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2012 1:47:21 PM
Creation date
11/6/1998 7:01:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
7/15/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
197
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Executive Summary <br />Current Funding <br />• Approximately $20.3 million was spent in FY 95-96 on core homeless services in <br />Alameda County (compared to $49 million in San Francisco, which reports 6,000 <br />to 10,000 homeless people per night). <br />• Roughly 53 % of funds to serve the homeless originate from the Federal <br />Government, 26% from the County, and 11 % from the cities. <br />• Nearly one third of all homeless funding goes to emergency services and shelters, <br />one third to support services (including health), and one third to all other areas of <br />the continuum including transitional and permanent housing. Less than 1 % goes to <br />prevention. Although these figures vary by county subregion, all areas spend a <br />large portion on emergency services. <br />• Roughly 67% of funding for homeless services and housing is spent in North <br />County, 12 % in Mid County, 8 % in South County, 5 % in East County, and 8 % <br />county-wide. <br />Summary of 1997-98 Action Plan Goals <br />This Plan contains many recommendations to maintain, improve and increase homeless <br />housing and services. Not all of the recommendations can be addressed in the first year, and <br />many require further planning or research before they can be implemented. <br />The following Plan recommendations are the primary goals for the Plan to begin addressing in <br />the coming year. They have been selected as the best intersection of what the planners believe <br />can be supported with the resources available for the Continuum and what is in the Plan. <br />Priorities or goals may shift if new opportunities arise. The recommendations are not specific <br />to certain subpopulations, although the need for expansion of services to many different <br />groups is highlighted in the overview of the service system in Chapter 3 as well as in many <br />specific recommendations in the full text. <br />Alameda County-Wide Homeless Continuum of Care Plan: April 1997 <br />v <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.