Laserfiche WebLink
New Cities Development is in the process of planning development of the Humphreys <br />property which extends from the School District property east to the eastern boundary <br />of the NSSP area. It would be required to extend the "East/West Collector" from the <br />School District property to the eastern boundary of the NSSP area. New Cities would <br />like to proceed with construction at the same time as Greenbriar. <br /> <br />Both the Greenbriar and New Cities schedules assume that the projects will proceed <br />without any major time delays, and represent the most optimistic timing scenarios. <br /> <br />Could the Bypass Road Alternate A section (identified in the February 20, 1997, staff <br />report) be used for the portion of the Bypass Road from the City water tank to the <br />Medium Density Residential area on the Spotorno property, and Alternate B be used to <br />continue to the Golf Course entrance? <br /> <br />Yes, various sections could be used for different portions of the Bypass Road, and this <br />may ultimately be appropriate. The final design may also consider using a bridge form <br />one alternate and a road section from a different alternate. For example, the difference <br />in total cost for Alternate A and Alternate B is approximately $160,000. A combination <br />of these two road sections would reduce costs by a relatively small amount over the cost <br />of Alternate A alone. <br /> <br />Why is the 83, O00-cubic yard figure for the "Cut @ Saddle, line item the same for all <br />the four road section scenarios (pages 6-9 of Appendix 1 in the February 20, 1997, staff <br />report) ? <br /> <br />The extent of the Bypass Road grading associated with the "Saddle" area in the south <br />Spotorno property would be approximately the same for each of the four road section <br />scenarios. Although the road width would have a minor impact on the amount of <br />grading, the preponderance of grading would be required primarily to reduce the height <br />of the "Saddle" by more than 35 feet. The actual height reduction would be the same <br />for all four scenarios. <br /> <br />It is important to note that the "Cut @ Saddle" line item is not the only one related to <br />grading. It is also important to consider the other grading costs identified on pages 6-9 <br />of the February 20, 1997, staff report, which include: <br /> <br />· Clear and Grub <br />· Erosion Control <br />· Roading Cut and Fill <br />· Off Haul Excess Soil. <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br /> <br />