Laserfiche WebLink
tion basins in conformance to Urban Stormwater RunoffRequirements, will be subject to <br /> City review and standards. The project developer would be required to be responsible for <br /> implementing a construction "Best Management Practice" during all construction phases <br /> of the project. The flood hazard maps of the Federal Emergency Management Agency <br /> (FEMA) indicate that the project site is not located within a flood prone area. <br /> <br /> X <br /> May be Insignificant Insignificant <br /> Significant if Mitigated <br /> <br />3.06 Plant and Animal Impacts (Effect on Existing Ecosystem, Rare or Endangered Spe- <br /> cies, Etc.): <br /> <br /> The subject property is characterized by rolling hillsides covered with grasses, shrubs, <br /> and numerous trees. Two biotic habitats dominate most of the site: <br /> <br /> · ridge tops and southerly facing slopes support primarily non-native grassland charac- <br /> teristic of grazing lands; and, <br /> <br /> · northerly slopes and canyon bottoms support areas of blue oak woodland (blue oak, <br /> valley oak, coast live oak, and California buckeye, with understory vegetation similar <br /> to that found in the grassland areas. <br /> <br /> Wildlife species include raptors and other bird species, red fox, California ground squir- <br /> rel, spotted skunk, black-tailed deer, etc., with the majority of wildlife inhabiting the <br /> site's more heavily vegetated areas. Although many of these areas would remain Undis- <br /> turbed by the proposed site development, some wildlife displacement is likely to occur. <br /> The site is also probable habitat area for threatened and/or endangered species, including <br /> red-legged frog, tiger salamander, etc. An issue for this proposal would be the amount <br /> and type of domestic herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers, etc., that would drain into the <br /> creek channel, swales, and gullies from private yards and streets and the effect that these <br /> materials would have on creek wildlife and habitat. A detailed analysis of flora, fauna, <br /> and habitat areas will be required to determine the proposed project's impacts and mitiga- <br /> tion measures. <br /> <br /> As stated in the preliminary tree report, "Tree Report for the Kottinger Hills Subdivi- <br /> sion'', dated October 8, 2003, prepared by Douglas E. Nix of Ralph Osterling Consult- <br /> ants, Inc., there are an estimated 12,000 trees - primarily blue oak, California buckeye, <br /> coast live oak, and valley oak species - located on the subject property with a total of 924 <br /> trees located within the project area. Of this number, 122 trees including 77 heritage-size <br /> trees would be removed with site development and another 59 trees including 44 heri- <br /> tage-size trees could be impacted. Normally, where heritage-size trees are removed with <br /> development, replacement trees of a similar species or variety of species is required. <br /> <br />PUD-33, Initial Study Page 6 o fl 1 December 4, 2003 <br /> <br /> <br />