PC-2025-24 - Laserfiche WebLink

Resolution No. PC-2025-24 Page 3 projected this Property (listed as Area 19 in Table B-15) would provide up to 52 moderate income residential units. The Project would provide 52 above-moderate income residential units, which is 52 more above-moderate income units than projected. However, the inventory of sites provides a buffer of 56 units in excess of the City’s assigned 894-unit moderate-income regional housing needs allocation (RHNA). As a result, the approval would not require re -zoning of additional sites to meet the moderate income RHNA. Section 5: Findings for Vesting Tentative Map 8749 State law and the Zoning Ordinance of the PMC set forth the considerations to be addressed in reviewing a Vesting Tentative Map. The Planning Commission makes the following findings that Vesting Tentative Map 8 749 conforms to the purposes of the PMC: 1. The proposed vesting tentative subdivision map conforms to the zoning regulations/development plan. The Vesting Tentative Tract Map and improvements conform to the Design Review development plan and site development standards of P23-0563. The map and improvements, therefore, would conform to the underlying Public and Institutional zoning district and HOZ. 2. The design of the subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities. As approved and conditioned in the Design Review development plan, the condominiums in the project will comply with the City’s residential Green Building Ordinance, Climate Action Plan 2.0, and the State’s Title 24 Building Energy Efficiency Standards, and would be required to incorporate a series of renewable energy design and energy efficiency features . 3. The proposed vesting tentative subdivision map, together with its design and improvement, is consistent with the Pleasanton General Plan. P23-0563 is found to be consistent with the Pleasanton General Plan and Vesting Tentative Map 8749 was submitted based on the proposed development plan. The proposed subdivision and its improvements are compatible with the applicable objectives, policies, land uses, and programs specified in the General Plan. 4. The subdivision site is physically suitable for this type and density of development. The property is not in a flood zone or earthquake fault zone and is relatively flat. Project construction would involve minimal site grading and alteration of existing topography. Thus, the project site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 5. The design of the subdivision and improvements covered by the proposed vesting tentative subdivision map will not cause substantial environmental damage and avoidably injure fish and/or wildlife or their habitat. Docusign Envelope ID: 52DE2131-F0C9-4C18-86DD-6B9E7ADA8792