My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Appendix H - Transportation Supporting Information COMBINED
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2025
>
12-10
>
ITEM 5 EXHIBIT A
>
Appendix H - Transportation Supporting Information COMBINED
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/2/2025 4:02:55 PM
Creation date
12/2/2025 3:59:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
206
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Transportation Impact Study for Hidden Canyon Residences & Preserve <br />March 2023 Page | 12 <br />2.0 STUDY METHODOLOGY <br />This chapter discusses the LOS analysis methodology for study intersections and criteria used to identify <br />significant impacts. <br />2.1 LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY <br />LOS is a qualitative measure that describes operational conditions as they relate to the traffic stream and <br />perceptions by motorists and passengers. The LOS generally describes these conditions in terms of such <br />factors as speed and travel time, delays, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort, convenience, <br />and safety. The operational LOS are given letter designations from A to F, with A representing the best <br />operating conditions (free-flow) and F the worst (severely congested flow with high delays). Intersections <br />generally are the capacity-controlling locations with respect to traffic operations on arterial and collector <br />streets. Table 1 summarizes the relationship between the control delay and LOS for signalized <br />intersections. <br />Table 1: Level of Service Definitions for Signalized Intersections <br />Level of <br />Service Description <br />A <br />Very low control delay, up to 10 seconds per vehicle. Progression is extremely <br />favorable, and most vehicles arrive during the green phase. Many vehicles do not stop <br />at all. Short cycle lengths may tend to contribute to low delay values. <br />B <br />Control delay greater than 10 and up to 20 seconds per vehicle. There is good <br />progression or short cycle lengths or both. More vehicles stop causing higher levels <br />of delay. <br />C <br />Control delay greater than 20 and up to 35 seconds per vehicle. Higher delays are <br />caused by fair progression or longer cycle lengths or both. Individual cycle failures may <br />begin to appear. Cycle failure occurs when a given green phase does not serve queued <br />vehicles, and overflow occurs. The number of vehicles stopping is significant, though <br />many still pass through the intersection without stopping. <br />D <br />Control delay greater than 35 and up to 55 seconds per vehicle. The influence of <br />congestions becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from some <br />combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, or high volumes. Many <br />vehicles stop, the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. Individual cycle failures <br />are noticeable. <br />E Control delay greater than 55 and up to 80 seconds per vehicle. The limit of <br />acceptable delay. High delays usually indicate poor progression, long cycle lengths, <br />and high volumes. Individual cycle failures are frequent. <br />F <br />Control delay in excess of 80 seconds per vehicle. Unacceptable to most drivers. <br />Oversaturation, arrival flow rates exceed the capacity of the intersection. Many <br />individual cycle failures. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also be <br />contributing factors to higher delay. <br />Source: Highway Capacity Manual 6 <br />~KM
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.