My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2025
>
021825 REGULAR
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2025 12:05:26 PM
Creation date
8/13/2025 12:01:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/18/2025
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
479
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
February 17, 2025 <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />To: Mayor Balch, City Council Members, City Manager and Staff <br />From: Carol Olson, Resident of The Village at Ironwood <br /> <br />Subject: Arroyo Lago Contaminants, history of Busch Pitt, and removal of seasonal bird <br />migration water location by imported landfill, apparently unauthorized. <br /> <br />I, together with the residents of The Village at Ironwood, live in a 55+ community. However, <br />we, and at least half of the residents are 65-75 years old. The toxicity levels for the <br />contaminants which are addressed in the Draft EIR DO NOT ADDRESS THE INCREASED <br />SENSITIVITY TO THOSE COMTAMINANTS FOR THE ELDERLY!!! The Draft EIR does not address <br />the reduces tolerance levels of their next-door communities like ours! <br /> <br />Our interest in the Proposed development in this context stems from the prior use of the land <br />for Hanson Aggregates Radom Facility, soil fill after usage, and various dumping and use of <br />“Ponds” with backfill materials which had contained hazardous material s. Having gone through <br />much, but not all, of the Appendix F, (7218 pages) it is astonishing that anyone would consider <br />living in such an Arroyo Lago area! With increased age, we would not have moved here if we <br />knew of the reduced quality of life and life expectancy upon doing so. <br /> <br />All of the issues contained in the Hazards section 3.2 and 3.8 of the Draft EIR, while important <br />on an individual basis, will have a measurable impact on the Health and Safety of the existing <br />residents. A summary of those which have been studied in the allotted time are described here, <br />as best as could be done in such a short time for the following: <br />• For the general population, as was done fin the Draft EIR, and <br />• For the elderly population which are most impacted by the proposed development <br /> <br />Impact areas: <br /> <br />1) Even though some tests and borings at different times and locations were made in the <br />most obvious hazardous locations, see figures below from the report dated Oct 26, 2007 <br />through 2017 (maybe more) they were performed in the site, namely in AOC 6 (Busch <br />Pit) AOC 7 and EB-35 for example. The fact that residual hazardous materials such as <br />Chromium, Arsenic, other Heavy Metals, and hydrocarbons, for example, in the original <br />or fill materials is alarming. (see Appendix F report) last 25% of the report on test <br />borings, etc. page ~5140 onward. <br /> <br />The levels provided in the Draft EIR are the dominant consideration for the target population <br />for a community development, so we assume. However, the hazardous levels for the elderly <br />are obviously less than for the general population because of their reduced immune system <br />functions and general aging of their bodies and minds. <br /> <br />It is both physical and mental acuity which set the levels of hazardous environmental resistance <br />which affect our elderly communities.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.