My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 2024077
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2020-present
>
2024
>
RES 2024077
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2025 12:42:42 PM
Creation date
1/27/2025 12:42:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
12/17/2024
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
of this study.Thus,the Service Population added as a result of new growth will represent 22.7%of <br /> the total future Service Population. <br /> Costs Attributable to Pleasanton <br /> The next step in the nexus analysis is to determine the proportion of project costs attributable to <br /> the land uses within the City of Pleasanton. <br /> Land use growth to the buildout year was incorporated into the Pleasanton travel demand model <br /> and the model was applied to generate estimates of travel patterns and volumes in the future. A <br /> common modeling technique called a select zone analysis was applied to identify the amount of <br /> future traffic volume on each roadway link that would be generated by land uses in Pleasanton. <br /> On each model link that represents the location of a project, the future traffic volume attributable <br /> to Pleasanton was compared to the overall future traffic volume, thereby calculating the share of <br /> the usage of that link that can be attributed to land uses in Pleasanton.These usage percentages <br /> are shown in Attachment 1 in the column called Percent Pleasanton Trips, From Model. <br /> Following the same approach that was used in the 2018 TIF nexus study, if more than 70%of the <br /> usage of the facility was from Pleasanton,that indicates that the need for the improvement is <br /> predominantly due to Pleasanton-related travel so the entire cost of the project was considered <br /> to be included in the TIF program.This approach was used in recognition of the "lumpiness" of <br /> most transportation infrastructure (for example, it is not possible to build half of a left-turn lane or <br /> half of a traffic signal), and the consideration that if Pleasanton traffic was contributing more than <br /> 70%of the need for an improvement then it would be reasonable to conclude that the <br /> improvement would not be needed but for the growth in Pleasanton. If less than 70% of the <br /> usage was from Pleasanton, the percentage attributable to Pleasanton was used directly from the <br /> model.The result is shown in Attachment 1 in the column called Percent Pleasanton Trips, <br /> Adjusted. Note that these percentages have been newly calculated only for the 19 additional <br /> projects proposed to be included in the TIF program. For all of the projects that are remaining <br /> from the current TIF project list,the percentage of future traffic volume attributable to Pleasanton <br /> has not been re-calculated but is carried forward from the 2018 TIF nexus study. <br /> For projects that involve bicycle, pedestrian or safety enhancements, or those that are city-wide <br /> projects, the percentage attributable to Pleasanton is calculated based on current data about <br /> existing service population and projections of future growth. Per the growth projections described <br /> above,that value is 22.7%. <br /> Final Nexus Results <br /> For each project,the cost to be included in the TIF program was calculated as the estimated <br /> project cost multiplied by the eligibility factor(thus accounting for existing deficiencies and direct <br /> developer contributions)and then multiplied by the Percent Pleasanton Trips,Adjusted.As shown <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.