Laserfiche WebLink
Table 1: Projected Water SFR Equivalents <br /> Line No. Descri•tion Derivation Values <br /> Future Water System Capacity <br /> 1 Future Capacity (MGD) - 6.06 <br /> 2 Future Capacity (GPD) Line 1 x 1,000,000 6,060,000 <br /> SFR Equivalent Capacity Demand <br /> 3 GPD Demand - 390 <br /> 4 Max Day Peaking Factor - 1.9 <br /> 5 GPD Max Day Demand Line 3 x Line 4 741 <br /> 6 SFR Equivalent Units Served Line 2 / Line 5 8,178 <br /> INCREMENTAL UNIT COST <br /> The Incremental unit cost for an SFR equivalent is the quotient of the Incremental system valuation divided by the <br /> additional SFR equivalent units served by expansion projects. The Incremental unit cost component is $2,721.29 <br /> per SFR equivalent unit. Table 2 shows the unit cost calculation. <br /> Table 2: Water Incremental Unit Cost Calculation <br /> Line No. Fee Calculation Derivation Values <br /> 1 Expansion CIP - $22,255,100 <br /> 2 SFR Equivalent Units Served Table 1 8,178 <br /> 3 SFR Equivalent Unit Fee Line 1 / Line 2 $2,721.29 <br /> Wastewater Connection Fee <br /> SYSTEM VALUE <br /> The cost basis for determining the Incremental, or expansion,system value was provided by City Staff. The$5.0 <br /> million valuation includes expansion projects related to upsizing pipes in the system, as shown in Table 3 below. <br /> Table 3: Wastewater Incremental System Value <br /> Line No. S stem Valuation Derivation Values <br /> 1 Project 3: Upsize Pipes downstream of Stoneridge _ $3,000,000 <br /> Mall <br /> 2 Project 4: Upsize Pipes on Kamp and Stoneridge <br /> Drive $2,019,000 <br /> 3 Total Expansion CIP Line 1 + Line 2 $5,019,000 <br /> EQUIVALENT UNITS <br /> To determine the Incremental capacity fee, the next step is to determine the demands that can be served by the <br /> expansion improvements above. The SFR equivalent capacity demand for wastewater is calculated by multiplying <br /> the SFR demand based on billed water consumption times a return to sewer factor to estimate the amount of water <br /> usage entering the wastewater system. The return to sewer factor calculation is outlined in Table 4. The City <br /> provided the estimated billed water consumption in hundred cubic feet(HCF)and the number of wastewater <br /> accounts for previous financial planning work. Table S1101 (2022: ACS 1-Year Estimates)from the U.S. Census <br /> Bureau is used for the average family size. The flow per day is based on California Water Code Section 10608.20 <br /> (b)(2)(A). The SFR equivalent capacity demand calculation is outlined in Table 5. <br /> WATER CAPACITY AND MISCELLANEOUS FEE STUDY 12 <br />