Laserfiche WebLink
Page 12 of 16 <br />reserve is alarmingly low, clearly indicating that other cities are better prepared to address <br />emergencies and other unforeseen expenses. The City of Danville and the City of San <br />Ramon reported $26.2 million and $26.1 million in unrestricted reserve in their General Fund, <br />respectively. However, since both cities are not full-service cities as fire services for both <br />Contra Costa cities are provided through a special district, their reserve levels are also strong <br />compared to Pleasanton’s $38.6 million. <br /> <br />The table below shows the percentages of Tri-Valley cities’ FY 2022/23 unrestricted General <br />Fund reserve as a percentage of their FY 2022/23 actual expenditure, excluding transfers to <br />other funds, as these transfers for some cities can be significant in some years or one-time in <br />nature. Reserve calculation is not required for this type of expenditure. Pleasanton has the <br />lowest reserve percentage compared to the other four cities. <br /> <br />Please note that the City’s General Fund reserve policy requires the calculation be based on <br />next year’s operating budget, and the Rainy Day Reserve and other program reserves, which <br />will be spent down over time for capital needs, to be excluded from the calculation. Using the <br />FY 2023/24 budget and excluding other reserves for calculation, the reserve is 20.0%. <br /> <br /> <br />Pension and Retiree Medical Trust Funds <br />Like some agencies, the City established Section 115 pension and retiree medical trust funds <br />to mitigate costs and pay down its unfunded liabilities. At the end of FY 2022/23, the total <br />market value of the pension trust assets was $46.3 million. Due to improvements in the <br />market, the total market value was $51.1 million at the end of FY 2023/24. With changing <br />market conditions, the investment balance is expected to fluctuate from time to time. <br /> <br />Due to the General Fund structural deficit, the City Council requested an analysis on the use <br />of trust funds to bridge the budget gap. The City engaged an actuarial consultant to conduct <br />the analysis, and the consultant presented the results and recommendation to the City <br />Council on May 21, 2024 (see the City Council Agenda at the <br />link https://pleasantonca.portal.civicclerk.com/event/214/files/agenda/338), advising the City <br />not to use the funds or minimum use of the funds. Without the pension trust funds, the City’s <br />funded status is below state average. <br /> <br />As part of the analysis, the consultant projected the City’s pension costs over the next three <br />decades using three scenarios, as shown in the chart below. Over the next 12 years, the <br />City’s pension contributions are expected to remain high. If pension trust funds are used <br />aggressively, the City will face significant challenges in meeting its obligations during the <br />peak period (still years away) and sustaining City services and programs, as funds will not be <br />Page 14 of 109