CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET - Laserfiche WebLink

Page 2 of 4 area is deemed an excess right-of-way of a street or highway not required for street or highway purposes (§8334(a)). 3. The City Council may vacate a street, highway, or public service easement by adopting a Resolution of Summary Vacation (§8335(a)(1)). 4. The Resolution of Summary Vacation shall state the following (§8335(b)): a. That the vacation is made under this chapter. b. That the vacation area is precisely described. c. That the facts under which this summary vacation is made are as stated in this report. d. That from and after the date this Resolution of Summary Vacation is recorded with the Alameda County Recorder’s Office, the street, highway, or public service easement vacated no longer constitutes a street, highway, or public service easement. e. That notice of the Resolution of Summary Vacation has been provided to all entities having any right, title, or interest in the public service easement. 5. The City Manager has been authorized by City Council Resolution No. 89-31 to accept on behalf of the City deeds or grants conveying any interest in or easement upon real estate to the City of Pleasanton, including replacement easements. BACKGROUND On September 11, 1984, the City Council adopted Resolution 84-470 approving a final map for Tract 5189, Grey Eagle Estates, a subdivision that included the grant of public service and public access easements to the City. Said final map was subsequently recorded on October 23, 1984 (Book 148 of maps at pages 46 to 51). An amended version of the final map was recorded on May 19, 1985 (Book 153 of maps at pages 34 to 39), yet the amended map included no changes to the granted easements. On November 15, 2002, the City entered into an Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Real Property with Allen and Sally Roberts for land necessary to construct the Bonde II water reservoir. On July 1, 2005, a First Amendment to Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Real Property was executed by Allen Roberts and the City that contained within Provision 10 specific requirements for improvement of the easement areas granted to the City, and included the following language: “If, at any time in the future, Buyer [Roberts] desires to relocate the Current Easement so that the driveway of a new home (“New Home Driveway”) would be within such relocated easement, the Buyer will grant to City, in a location acceptable to City, a new twenty (20) foot easement at such location and for such purpose (“New Easement”), and City shall concurrently abandon that portion of the Current Easement that is replaced by the New Easement.” On March 14, 2022, the Planning Division approved a custom home application (P23-1171) for 29 Grey Eagle Court, subject to Conditions of Approval. Condition 40 of the approval requires the applicant to work with the City to adjust previously dedicated public easements to accommodate the development of the property. Page 123 of 201