03 - Laserfiche WebLink

City of Pleasanton Pleasanton Climate Action Plan 2.0 Natural Gas Power Facilities/Infrastructure PG&E provides natural gas services to the City. The CAP 2.0 would not involve new land uses that require new or additional natural gas service that could require the construction of new or expanded natural gas facilities. CAP 2.0 Actions P1 and P2 would encourage building electrification in new and existing buildings to reduce natural gas consumption within the City. Implementation of these actions could involve minor alterations to existing natural gas infrastructure as natural gas use is reduced. However, the CAP 2.0 would serve as a pathway to reduce GHG emissions, including emissions related to energy consumption, and other beneficial environmental and sustainability effects. These benefits include a reduction in natural gas consumption. Therefore, the CAP 2.0 would result in a less -than -significant impact related to construction, expansion, or relocation of natural gas facilities and infrastructure. Telecommunications Facilities/Infrastructure The City is served by existing telecommunications companies such as AT&T and Comcast. The CAP 2.0 would not alter existing telecommunications facilities and infrastructure and would not involve new land uses or development that would require new telecommunications infrastructure. Therefore, the CAP 2.0 result in no impact related to need for construction or expansion of telecommunication facilities and infrastructure. b. Would the project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? c. Would the project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? The CAP 2.0 is a policy -level document that does not include site specific infrastructure designs or project proposals, nor does it grant entitlements for development that would have the potential to increase demand for water supply or wastewater treatment. Rather the CAP 2.0 contains strategies and actions to reduce water use and wastewater production, such as Strategies WR -1 and TLU-3, that encourage water efficiency retrofits to existing buildings and landscaping and LEED development for new buildings, that would reduce water demand and wastewater production. Thus, the CAP 2.0 would result in no impact related to water supply and wastewater treatment. d. Would the project generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? e. Would the project comply with federal, State, and local managPmPnt and rpdurtinn statutec and regulations related to solid waste? Pleasanton Garbage Service, Inc. provides solid waste services for residential and commercial uses within the City. Solid waste and recyclable materials collected in the City are sorted at the Pleasanton Transfer Station. Municipal solid waste generated in Pleasanton is primarily disposed of at the Vasco Road Sanitary Landfill in Livermore. The Vasco Road Sanitary Landfill has a maximum