03 - Laserfiche WebLink

Environmental Checklist Public Services Less than Significant Potentially with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: 1. Fire protection? ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 2. Police protection? ❑ ❑ ❑ s 3. Schools? ❑ ❑ ❑ 4. Parks? ❑ ❑ ❑ 5. Other public facilities? ❑ ❑ ❑ E a. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: ■ Fire protection? ■ Police protection? ■ Schools? ■ Parks? ■ Other public facilities? The CAP 2.0 is a policy document containing programs that are consistent with the Pleasanton General Plan. Implementation of the CAP 2.0 and its proposed strategies and actions would not result in increases in population or new employment opportunities that could induce population growth, as further discussed in Section 14, Population and Housing. As such, the CAP 2.0 would not require the construction of new or physically altered governmental facilities to serve additional population, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts. CAP 2.0 Strategy CRW-1 and Actions S8 and S9 would help to increase community resiliency and reduce vulnerability to the impacts of climate change and mitigate hazards such as flooding and wildfire Final Initial Study — Negative Declaration 73