03 - Laserfiche WebLink

City of Pleasanton Pleasanton Climate Action Plan 2.0 a. Would the project induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b. Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? The CAP 2.0 does not include strategies, policies, or programs that would result in new housing or jobs or that would displace existing residents or housing. In addition, the CAP 2.0 does not propose new infrastructure, such a roadways or utilities, that could indirectly lead to new population growth or development. Therefore, the CAP 2.0 would not directly increase the population, indirectly induce additional unplanned population growth, or displace people or housing. Therefore, the CAP 2.0 would result in no impact related to population and housing. Cumulative Impacts The cumulative projects scenario is overall General Plan buildout for Pleasanton in 2025 plus Pleasanton population projections through 2045. CAP 2.0 projects, in combination with other cumulative projects anticipated under Pleasanton General Plan buildout, are not anticipated to displace people or housing nor induce substantial unplanned population growth within Pleasanton. Specifically, the CAP 2.0 would not contribute to person or housing displacement in Pleasanton nor result in population growth beyond that already assumed and planned for in the Pleasanton General Plan and in accordance with Pleasanton 2045 population projections. Therefore, the CAP 2.0 would result in no cumulative impact related to population and housing. 72 Less than Significant Potentially with Significant Mitigation Impact Incorporated Less than Significant No Impact Impact Would the project: a. Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? ❑ ❑ ■ b. Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? r.: C Ll ■ a. Would the project induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b. Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? The CAP 2.0 does not include strategies, policies, or programs that would result in new housing or jobs or that would displace existing residents or housing. In addition, the CAP 2.0 does not propose new infrastructure, such a roadways or utilities, that could indirectly lead to new population growth or development. Therefore, the CAP 2.0 would not directly increase the population, indirectly induce additional unplanned population growth, or displace people or housing. Therefore, the CAP 2.0 would result in no impact related to population and housing. Cumulative Impacts The cumulative projects scenario is overall General Plan buildout for Pleasanton in 2025 plus Pleasanton population projections through 2045. CAP 2.0 projects, in combination with other cumulative projects anticipated under Pleasanton General Plan buildout, are not anticipated to displace people or housing nor induce substantial unplanned population growth within Pleasanton. Specifically, the CAP 2.0 would not contribute to person or housing displacement in Pleasanton nor result in population growth beyond that already assumed and planned for in the Pleasanton General Plan and in accordance with Pleasanton 2045 population projections. Therefore, the CAP 2.0 would result in no cumulative impact related to population and housing. 72