My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
16
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2019
>
101519
>
16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2019 4:41:22 PM
Creation date
10/9/2019 4:15:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/15/2019
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
16 ATTACHMENT 4 (PLANS)
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2019\101519
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PUD-134 <br /> Hopyard Road Shel1/7-Eleven Redevelopment Initial Study and Negative Declaration <br /> the planning requirements of the COCA are more stringent than similar federal <br /> regulations; therefore, consistency with the CCAA will also demonstrate consistency <br /> with the CAA. <br /> STANDARDS OF SIGNIFICANCE <br /> For purposes of this environmental document, an impact is considered significant if <br /> the proposed project would: <br /> • Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan; <br /> • Result in pollution emission levels above those established by BAAQMD in <br /> either the short term (construction related) or long term (operations); <br /> • Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations; <br /> • Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. <br /> Less Than <br /> Significant <br /> Potentially Impact With Less Than <br /> Significant Mitigation Significant No <br /> Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br /> Air Quality <br /> Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality <br /> management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the <br /> following determinations. Would the project: <br /> a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the X <br /> applicable air quality plan? <br /> b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase X <br /> of any criteria pollutant for which the project <br /> region is non-attainment under an applicable <br /> federal or state ambient air quality standard <br /> (including releasing emissions, which exceed <br /> quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? <br /> c) Violate any air quality standard or contribute X <br /> substantially to an existing or projected air quality <br /> violation? <br /> d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant X <br /> concentrations? <br /> e) Create objectionable odors affecting a X <br /> substantial number of people? <br /> 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.