My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
030717
>
12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2017 3:00:33 PM
Creation date
3/1/2017 9:51:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/7/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
12
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
179
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Whalen reiterated that BRE needs definite guidelines it can work with, stating that it <br /> would be a shame to go through the process for nine months and then adopt guidelines <br /> from which he will be requesting a variance in two months. He brought up, as an <br /> example, the matter of reduced setback with enhanced landscaping or open space. He <br /> indicated that he looks at this as an opportunity to negotiate, with the guidelines not <br /> meaning anything and turning a six-month approval process into a year. <br /> John McPartland, District 5 BART Director and Task Force member, stated that BART <br /> endorses the guidelines and complimented the facilitator in his effectiveness. He noted <br /> that the input was varied, often contentious but cordial, and the process was complete, <br /> resulting in an end product that is the best available from the heart and soul of the <br /> community and the best professional judgment from a business perspective. He <br /> indicated that BART intends to be an active and participative partner in moving forward. <br /> Referring to Parcel 1 and the design guidelines for Owens Drive, Commissioner Pentin <br /> asked Mr. McPartland where BART is with regard to development on the BART parking <br /> lot and property. <br /> Mr. McPartland replied that he is not in a position to permanently give up any parking <br /> spaces. He added that whatever development comes forward on the north side of <br /> Owens Drive should be mimicked on the south side in order to achieve balance. <br /> Commissioner Pentin stated that currently, the plan indicates that Parcel 1 will <br /> potentially be developed soon while the other side of the street may not be on board for <br /> another five to twenty years. He inquired how this might affect what is done on Parcel 1 <br /> both sides of the street would not come together at the same time. <br /> Mr. McPartland replied that he would personally be involved in this if it happens <br /> immediately. He indicated that he is very proactive in relation to supporting the Iron <br /> Horse Trail integration into the plan, and he wants to help facilitate that in any way he <br /> possibly can. He added that he would like to see a more detailed effort put into this. <br /> Commissioner Pentin stated that the opportunity to take Owens Drive and try to turn it <br /> into a quieter, slower, retail/residential street versus what it is today will require support <br /> from both sides of the street. He inquired if BART would come in at the same time to <br /> develop the north side of Owens Drive should a developer start work on the south side. <br /> He inquired further if this would be a priority for BART and if BART would be willing to <br /> partner in at the same time. <br /> Mr. McPartland replied that BART will not just stand around and wait while the southern <br /> portion of Owens Drive is being completed. He indicated that this would be a <br /> partnership and that BART would be working in tandem. <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, January 26, 2011 Page 15 of 40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.