Laserfiche WebLink
• Policy Issues Yet to be Resolved. <br /> The issues outlined below were unresolved at the time of the Joint Workshop. <br /> Any further recommendations made by the Hacienda Task Force at its January 6 <br /> meeting are noted below. <br /> Issue Resolved by: <br /> The feasibility of potential projects Staff/consultants will review and evaluate <br /> developed under the TOD pro forma numbers provided by the <br /> Standards and Guidelines developer and will prepare a memo on <br /> feasibility. This item is in process and will <br /> be available prior to City Council action on <br /> the Standards and Guidelines. <br /> The provision of group (private) Some Task Force members wished to <br /> open space or a public park provide greater encouragement including <br /> incentives for a public park to serve new <br /> development in Hacienda. Text in the <br /> draft was changed to specifically identify <br /> that the group open space requirement <br /> can be met with a public park. The <br /> Planning Commission may wish to <br /> consider additional incentives to make a <br /> public park an attractive option for <br /> developers. <br /> Residential density: need for an As this issue was discussed by the Task <br /> average density to be included in the Force at its last meeting it appeared to be <br /> TOD Standards and Guidelines more an issue of potential incompatibility <br /> of new three or four story residential <br /> development with surrounding lower <br /> intensity residential uses. Additional <br /> design guidelines (section D.10) have <br /> been added in the revised draft to identify <br /> features that assist in making the two <br /> types of development compatible such as <br /> additional landscaping and architectural <br /> treatments. <br /> Retail development: how much and The Task Force discussed this issue again <br /> where? at its last meeting. All members present, <br /> except one, agreed with the minimum <br /> retail requirement of 5,000 square feet of <br /> retail on Parcel 1 and a minimum of <br /> 10,000 square feet for the three parcels <br /> combined, as stated on p. 13. There was <br /> less clear-cut support for the text in the <br /> Live/Work section. However, when the <br /> live/work space was described as <br /> "live/work or other "active" space" there <br /> Case No. PRZ-57, City of Pleasanton Planning Commission <br /> Page 5 of 9 <br />