12 - Laserfiche WebLink

• Issues addressed by changes/clarifications to the Draft Hacienda TOD Standards and Design Guidelines. The following amendments/clarifications were discussed with the Hacienda Task Force at a follow-up meeting on January 6, 2011. There was general agreement with the changes noted below; any additional comments from the Task Force are included. Issue Resolved by: Owens Drive — desire to see an option Page 18 now includes an Owens Drive which does not significantly change the option showing the existing curb lines existing curb line of Owens Drive and median, and therefore requiring minimal change to the configuration of Owens Drive. Minimum height of retail buildings Page 12 now shows a 25-foot minimum height for principal structures. Permitted uses: should be specific or At the January 6, 2011 Task Force generalized? meeting there was conflicting input regarding making the list of uses more general or specific, and what uses should be prohibited or made subject to a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). Staff has made revisions (reflected in the draft, attached) and has clearly indicated uses requiring a CUP (including permitted uses operating between 10 p.m. and 6 a.m.) and prohibited uses. The current list does not prohibit liquor stores (as some Task Force members had desired) because staff was unable to draw a distinction between that and the wine bar/wine sales use that Task Force members wished to allow. Need for some flexibility regarding Staff notes the existing language under setbacks "Review Process" on p. 5 which provides for flexibility in implementing both the standards and the guidelines. General: appropriate language for Text on pages 5, 6, 13, 33 and 49 guidelines (i.e. no "shalls") changes "shall" to "should" in various guidelines. Bike and ped circulation around and Text or a legend has been added to through development is not clear diagrams on p. 7 and p. 9 to identify bike and pedestrian paths Case No. PRZ-57, City of Pleasanton Planning Commission Page 4 of 9