Laserfiche WebLink
Subject: FW: Lund Ranch II <br />Original Message <br />From: Gmail <br />Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 10:13 PM <br />To: Mayor and City Council <br />Subject: Lund Ranch II <br />City Council, <br />SLIPPLEMEINTAL MATERIAL <br />Prwic:ecd to the City Council <br />After Distribution of Packet <br />Date <br />I have been a resident of Pleasanton for 22 years and have raised my children here. I live at 5756 Hanifen Way, formally <br />for 10 years at 725 Crystal Lane. You could say that we have lived on "both sides have of the fence" of the Lund Ranch II <br />issue. <br />It is logical that the traffic of these 10 homes should be routed through Lund Ranch Road. This has always been the way <br />we always thought of this upcoming development since we lived on Crystal Lane. It is a logical access for residents, fire <br />or any emergency and allows fast and direct access to Bernal Ave., a major artery of the city. <br />Secondly, Option 1, access through Lund Ranch Road is the only option that is complaint with PP. Measure PP was voted <br />by the residents of Pleasanton and is not to be interpreted on a case -by -case basis. It is a beautiful piece of property <br />and this development, proposed roads and supporting grading /elevations will ruin one of the last rural areas of <br />Pleasanton. <br />Please do the right thing and vote for option 1. <br />Thank you, <br />Pat Markle <br />1 <br />