Laserfiche WebLink
Staff Option <br />Translation <br />1) Agree that Measure PP prohibits the <br />culvert crossing and that a road connection <br />to Sunset Creek is not allowed by Measure <br />PP. <br />Honor Measure PP and conclude that <br />bridges and 8 -foot high retaining walls are <br />"structures." <br />2) Accept the ridges as mapped previously <br />and presented to the public and allow the <br />creek crossing to Sunset Creek as permissible <br />within Measure PP. <br />Ignore the error and pretend the ridgelines <br />are as previously incorrectly represented. <br />3) Conclude that the retaining walls <br />proposed as part of the creek crossing are <br />not structures prohibited by Measure PP. <br />Conclude, contrary to any reasonable <br />understanding of the word, that bridges and <br />8 -foot walls are not "structures." <br />4) Acknowledge that the ridgeline extends to <br />beyond the water tank but determine that <br />Measure PP does not prevent the creek <br />crossing retaining walls in this particular case <br />due to their location at one of the lowest <br />elevations of the site. <br />Redraft Measure PP as follows: "structures <br />shall not be placed ... within 100 vertical feet <br />of a ridgeline, unless they are at some arbitrarily - <br />determined `low elevation. <br />This should, practically speaking, end debate. There is no reasonable interpretation of <br />"structure" that does not include 8 -foot high walls and bridges. <br />At a minimum the Council should remand this matter to the Commission to gets its <br />recommendation in light of these changed circumstances. Several members of the <br />Commission believed that walls are structures and roads are not (more on this later), and so <br />it would appear that the Commission would arrive at a different recommendation if it knew <br />the true ridgelines. <br />Pleasanton Code and the Code of Neighboring Communities <br />Taking a step back, to focus on what is meant by "structure" in PP, it is helpful to begin with <br />what our own ordinances say about structures. The most relevant code is the Pleasanton <br />Municipal Code, which defines "structure" as "anything constructed or erected which <br />requires a location on the ground." (PMC § 18.08.535.) <br />Because roads, retaining walls, and bridges "require(] a location on the ground," they are <br />clearly included within the Pleasanton Municipal Code's definition of "structure." The <br />California Government Code on planning and land use similarly states: "`structure' includes, <br />but is not limited to, any building, road, ... ." (Cal. Gov. Code, Chap. 4.5, Review and <br />Approval of Development Projects, § 65927.) <br />Both the Pleasanton and the California formulations appear to have widespread adoption: <br />