Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.- <br /> <br />Chairperson Maas noted that because the "right only onto the freeway" lane was lost <br />when driving west on Bernal, drivers frequently cut in front of the cars queued up <br />because there was no longer a solid white line. <br /> <br />Mr. Iserson noted that he had brought that up, and had not received a sympathetic <br />response. <br /> <br />8. MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW/ACTION <br /> <br />a. Future Planning Calendar <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Sullivan, Mr. Iserson replied that a meeting <br />regarding the Green Building Ordinance would be held on August 29, 2002, and that the <br />City Council would consider it during either the second meeting in September, or the first <br />meeting in October. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sullivan preferred that it not be pushed into October, and had hoped that it <br />be presented in the first meeting of September. <br /> <br />Mr. Iserson noted that the September 11 meeting had a full agenda, and added that the <br />East Side Workshop would be heard at the September 25 meeting. <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />Commissioner Sullivan preferred to hear the Green Building Ordinance prior to the East <br />Side item. He added that the Ordinance was reviewed and endorsed by the Energy <br />Advisory Group. The Economic Vitality Committee did not endorse it. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Chairperson Maas, Commissioner Sullivan replied that the <br />Green Building Ordinance was a commercial ordinance for buildings over 20,000 square <br />feet. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Chairperson Maas, Assistant City Attorney Lynn Nerland <br />noted that she had not seen the ordinance, but believed it would be triggered by the PUD <br />or Condition of Approval. Once that approval was in place, and if it was before the time <br />that the ordinance became effective (30 days after passage), it would be grandfathered in. <br />Therefore, the green building would not affect the maps. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Kameny, Mr. Iserson confirmed that the <br />Northstar Development on Vineyard was the Crispin/Berlager property subdivision. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Sullivan, Mr. Iserson replied that the roof <br />study was prepared at Commissioner Roberts' request... <br /> <br />b. Actions of the City Council <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Chairperson Maas, Mr. Iserson replied that the City Council <br />,--. would hear the service station during the September 3, 2002, meeting. <br /> <br />Plarming Commission Minutes <br /> <br />August 28, 2002 <br /> <br />Page 22 <br />