OCT 1933 TO MAY 1946 - Laserfiche WebLink

Treasurer-.--Showing that the Water Deposit Fund had $56.00 on hand per last report and that •5..00 had been collected during the month making a total of $61.00. The Curb and Gutter Project Fund had $79.86 on hand per last report and since then $531.51 had been collected making a total of $611.37 in the Curb and Gutter Fund. The Treasurer had $lo559.88 on-hand per last report and since then $1326.72 had been collected making a total of $11,886.60, less amount.of warrants paid $2725.49, leaving $9161.11 in the hands of the Treasurer. City Judge: -- Report showed that there were no fines during the month of February, 1936. Fire Chief:.--; Showing report of activities during the month of..February, 1936. Health Officer: -- Showing report of .activities during the month.of February, 1936. MiUT� Inspector: -- Showing Laboratory report of Milk Swmples for- February, 1936. The reports were referred to the finance committee for examination and report. ..The following communications were read at the request of Councilman Amaral, same were addressed to John J. Delucchi, Chief of Police: February 5th: State Board of Equalization advising that the Board had denied a Liquor application to A. D. Irwin, 725 Main Street for the following reasons: 1. Premises do not meet the requirement of the State Alcoholic Control Act. 2. Previous violation of the Alcoholic Be.verage Control Act. 3. Protest from District Attorney. February 19th: State Board of Equalization advising that the Board had denied a Liquor application to C. H. Fries, 742 Main Street, and Peter Bernet, 443 Main Street for the following reasons: C. H. Fries: 1. Objection from Chief of Police. 2. Premises do not meet the requirement of the State Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. 3. Protest from the District Attorney. Peter Bernet: 1. Premises do not meet the requirement of the State Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. A recess followed during which the finance committee examined Claims No. 375 to 417 inclusive and amounting to $954.67. After the meeting had been called to order again., Councilman Rivolta of the finance committee reported that the committee had examined and approved the claims and made a motion to the effect; that they be paid. His motion was seconded by councilman Olesen and with all the Councilmen present in favor of same. Councilman Rivolta also reported that the officers' monthly reports were accepted and moved that they be placed on file. Action on the communications were then taken as follows: February 5th: State Board of Equalization. Filed. February 19tJ1: Filed. Councilman Olesen,of the Street and Building Committee, reported to the Council that the slopewall would be, completed the end of this week as far as the work had gone. He recommended that the mixer, now being rented from C. A. Bruce and Sons be laid off until work was resumed on the slopewall again in order to minimize the expenses. He advised that the matter would be reported to Mr. Bruce so as to avid any misunderstanding. He also advised the-Council with regards to the tree planting and tree trimming that had been going on during is cent'weeks. He brought up the matter of the bridge on Neal Street in the vici=nity of the Southern Pacific'Railroad Company tracks..He reported that the matter had been debated in times past as to whether the town should fix same or the railroad company and he asked that an engineer be secured from the State Railroad Commission to pass upon same. The Clerk was instructed to correspond with the State Railroad Commission in San Francisco and report the matter to them and.ask that they send out an engineer to decide same. Councilman Olesen brought up the matter of the land of C,.S.Richards involved in the slopewall project.-and advised that he had taken up same with TAr. Harding of the First ,National Bank of Pleasanton who had something to say with regards to same and he in turn promised to go into the matter with Mr. Lucas, on or about Tuesday,.March 3d. Former City Clerk,'Letham, was in the audience and he was queried with'regards to a five foot strip along Division Street which the Council understood Mrs. Lewis had deeded to the city. Mr. Letham advised that when the street was put in on Division Street that Tars. Lewis had given such strip as did other prope`rty.owners along the street in order to widen the street but he did not know anything about a deed being signed. The Clerk was instructed to look over the minutes of the previous meetings with reference to *the matter and also to query Councilman Madsen with regards to -same. The slopewall matter was then taken up further with City Attorney Nilson. Mr.