Laserfiche WebLink
THE CITY OF 13 <br />~~ P <br />~L~£~S~4NTON® <br />llate: May 1, 2009 <br />To: Mayor and Members of the City Council <br />From: Oftice of the City Attorney <br />Subject: Supplemental Agenda Report Concerning the Appeal of the Planning Commission's <br />Decision to Deny the Tentative Map Application for the Vineyard Villa Mobilehome <br />Park <br />Summary <br />On the Council's regular agenda for May 5, 2009 is an agenda report concerning an appeal of the <br />Planning Commission's decision to deny the tentative map application that would allow the Vineyard <br />Villa Mobilehome Park to be converted to "residential ownership". For the reasons expressed in that <br />agenda report, staff recommends that the appeal be granted and therefore the application, with <br />conditions, be approved. ~fhe purpose of this supplemental report is to recommend that Council, in <br />addition to approving the application, take action to: add a condition to extend the term of the current <br />Rent Stabilization Agreement to 2025; support legislation that would strengthen local control over <br />mobilehomc conversions; and support other public entities' litigation efforts to exercise more local <br />control over mobilehomc conversions. <br />1. Extendin¢ the term of the current Rent Stabilization [1~reement. <br />[n 2007 the City Council approved a 2enl Stabilization agreement with the owner of the Vineyard Villa <br />Mobilehome Park. In general terms, it limits the park owner to raise rents annually to a cost of living <br />index, but with a floor of 2% and a ceiling of 5%. The Agreement has a five year term but also provides <br />that if the Council approves the residential conversion, the term would be extended for five additional <br />years, i.e., through December 2017. <br />Under existing state law concerning residential conversions, once lots begin to be sold, local rent control <br />regulations are abrogated in favor of state law provisions. 'I~hose provisions provide that as to <br />households that qualify as lower income households (currently, two person households earning less than <br />$53,000 annually would qualify as lower income), the park owner could raise rents no more than the <br />average of cost of living increases over the previous tour years. Hence, lower income households that <br />choose not to purchase their lots will continue to have rent control protection even after conversion. For <br />households that do not qualify as lower income households (and choose not to purchase their lots), the <br />state law provisions allow the park owner to raise space rents to "markcP', but over a five year period. <br />Flere, the owner has agreed that if the application is approved, he will not begin selling the lots for at <br />least 10 years; through at least 2017, rents would continue to be controlled through the current Rent <br />