Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PLEASANTON <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br />RESOLUTION NO. PC-2006-23 <br />RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE APPLICATION OF <br />KAZUO AND TAKIKO HATSUSHI FOR PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL, <br />AS FILED UNDER CASE PUD-99-14 <br />WHEREAS, Kazuo and Takiko Hatsushi have applied for PUD development plan approval of a new <br />klevelopment consisting of 13 new single-family homes and one existing single-family <br />home on an approximately 15-acre site located at 2756, 2770, and 2798 Vineyard <br />Avenue, in the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan Area; and <br />WHEREAS, zoning for the property is PUD-LDR and OS (Planned Unit Development -Low Density <br />Residential and Open Space) District. <br />WHEREAS, at its duly noticed public hearing of Apri126, 2006, the Planning Commission considered <br />all public testimony, relevant exhibits, and recommendations of the City staff concerning <br />this application; and <br />WHEREAS, the environmental review for the proposed project was undertaken with the Final <br />Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan, <br />approved by the City Council on March 1999 in conformance with the standards of the <br />California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and there are no substantial changes to <br />the project or to the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken that <br />involve new significant environmental effects or that substantially increase the severity of <br />previously identified effects; furthermore, there is no new information of substantial <br />importance, which was unknown at the time that the Final EIR was approved by the City <br />Council regarding the project or its effects, mitigation measures, or alternatives, and any <br />previously identified effects or impacts are mitigated to a level of insignificance, with the <br />mitigation measures incorporated into the project's design or imposed on the project <br />pursuant to the conditions of approval; and <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission made the following findings for the PUD development plan: <br />The plan is in the best interests of the public health, safety, and general welfare. <br />The proposed project, as designed and conditioned, meets all applicable City standards <br />concerning public health, safety, and welfare, e.g., vehicle access, geologic hazards (new <br />development not within a special studies zone), and flood hazards. Full public streets and <br />water, storm, and sanitary sewer lines are present to serve the proposed lots on this site. <br />Therefore, this finding can be made. <br />