Laserfiche WebLink
THE CITY OF 22 <br /> � ' -•• •°� -�=� "" CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT <br /> pL£ASANTON <br /> June 18, 2019 <br /> Engineering <br /> TITLE: POLICY DIRECTION FOR DESIGN OF PARKING LOT ON THE FORMER <br /> RAILROAD TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR BETWEEN BERNAL <br /> AVENUE AND ABBIE STREET - REVIEW 65 PERCENT COMPLETE <br /> PLANS FOR THE PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS <br /> SUMMARY <br /> The lack of available parking in the vicinity of downtown Pleasanton has been identified <br /> as a problem and has been the subject of numerous studies over the years. In 2017, the <br /> adopted CIP included a project to design and construct an expanded parking lot on the <br /> transportation corridor between Bernal Avenue and Abbie Street. The project is a City <br /> Council Work Plan item. The design is 65 percent complete, and follows the example <br /> set by the parking lot at the Firehouse Arts Center (FHAC) constructed in 2011 . <br /> However, the corridor right-of-way is only 75 feet wide in the current project, compared <br /> to the 100-foot-wide right-of-way at the FHAC. <br /> As 65 percent designed, the proposed parking lot is dimensioned very similar to the <br /> FHAC parking lot. The design includes a concrete pedestrian walkway that varies in <br /> width, with a minimum width of 8-feet in several locations. The design also includes <br /> lighting in both the parking lot and path area, as well as trees and other landscaping. As <br /> designed, the parking lot expands to 140 parking stalls, an increase of 81 spaces <br /> compared to the existing parking available in this section of the corridor. As part of the <br /> design process, City staff presented the project to the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trail <br /> Committee (BPTC) and Parks and Recreation Commission (PRC). The BPTC believes <br /> the design is too focused on parking. They recommended that the trail area be <br /> increased, which would result in a reduction in the proposed number of parking spaces. <br /> The PRC also wants this option explored. This input is not consistent with staff's <br /> interpretation of the goal of the project, and the adopted City Council Workplan priority, <br /> which was understood to be focused on increasing parking available in the downtown <br /> corridor. The item is before City Council for direction on how to proceed before <br /> additional time and funds are directed toward the current design. <br /> RECOMMENDATION <br /> 1 . Review the 65 percent design concept of the proposed project. <br /> 2. Reaffirm that staff's 65 percent design concept is consistent with City Council's <br /> direction. <br />