PC-2010-02, PCUP-260, GORMAN ROOFING

PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PLEASANTON ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. PC -2010-02 RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR GORMAN ROOFING AS FILED UNDER CASE PCUP-260 WHEREAS, Gorman Roofing has applied for a Conditional Use Permit to transfer an existing Conditional Use Permit (PCUP-189) for a roof contractor business from Suite 203 to Suite 202 of the building located at 1040 Serpentine Lane, in the Valley Business Park, and WHEREAS, zoning for the property is PUD -1 (Planned Unit Development — Industrial) District; and WHEREAS, at its duly noticed public hearing of January 27, 2010, the Planning Commission considered all public testimony, relevant exhibits, and recommendations of the City staff concerning this application; and WHEREAS, projects of this nature are categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15301, Existing Facilities, and Class 1; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission made the following findings: The proposed location of the conditional use is in accordance with the objectives of the zoning ordinance and the purpose of the district in which the site is located. The objectives of the zoning ordinance include fostering a harmonious, convenient, workable relationship among land uses, protecting land uses from inharmonious influences and harmful intrusions, promoting a safe, effective traffic circulation system, and ensuring that public and private lands ultimately are used for the purposes which are most appropriate and beneficial to the City as a whole. The subject business is proposed in Valley Business Park, which is zoned Planned Unit Development — Industrial (PUD -1) and is intended to provide locations for light industrial, neighborhood, commercial, and office uses. The proposed suite will provide Gorman Roofing a larger space to locate its office and warehouse. Further, the operation of the business is consistent with that of other similar uses within Valley Business Park and the conditions of approval imposed on the entitlement will ensure that the objectives of the zoning ordinance and the purpose of the district will be upheld. Therefore, this finding can be made.