Laserfiche WebLink
THE CITY OF _ _ 1 5 <br /> - CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT <br /> pL£ASANTON® <br /> May 17, 2016 <br /> Community Development Department <br /> Planning Division <br /> TITLE: CONSIDER APPLICATIONS FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT <br /> MAJOR MODIFICATIONS TO CONSTRUCT A SIX-STORY, <br /> APPROXIMATELY 410,000-SQUARE-FOOT OFFICE BUILDING, <br /> PARKING GARAGE, AND RELATED SITE IMPROVEMENTS AT <br /> 6110 AND 6120-6160 STONERIDGE MALL ROAD INSTEAD OF THE <br /> PREVIOUSLY-APPROVED PLANS TO CONSTRUCT A SIX-STORY, <br /> APPROXIMATELY 430,000-SQUARE-FOOT OFFICE BUILDING, TWO <br /> PARKING GARAGES, AND RELATED SITE IMPROVEMENTS. <br /> APPLICANT: Terrasset Management Group, on behalf of Workday, Inc. <br /> SUMMARY <br /> In 2014, Workday received City approval for a new 430,000-square-foot office building, <br /> two new parking structures, and a number of other public and private improvements. <br /> The current applications would modify Workday's previously-approved plans, resulting <br /> in an improved project in several ways, including: a more iconic office building design <br /> that is slightly smaller in floor area; elimination of a parking garage and improved design <br /> of the remaining parking garage; installation of a new public plaza behind the BART <br /> garage; enhanced pedestrian and bicycle connections between the BART station and <br /> Stoneridge Mall Road; and increased sustainability features. Similar to the approved <br /> project, Workday would construct a small addition and remodel the ground level of the <br /> BART parking garage to create a joint City/BART police service center. <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION <br /> The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Planned Unit Development <br /> (PUD) major modification applications subject to the conditions shown in Exhibit A <br /> (Attachment 1). <br /> RECOMMENDATION <br /> 1. Find that the anticipated environmental impacts of the proposed modified campus <br /> development project are adequately evaluated in the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative <br /> Declaration prepared for the previously-approved project (PUD-104/PUD-81-22- <br /> 14M) and that none of the conditions in California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) <br /> Guidelines Section 15162 calling for the preparation of subsequent environmental <br /> review have occurred; <br /> 2. Make the PUD findings for the modified development plan as stated in the April 13, <br /> 2016 Planning Commission staff report (pages 13-16 in Attachment 4); and <br />