RES 15748 - Laserfiche WebLink

RESOLUTION NO. 15-748 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON DENYING THE APPEAL OF GARY HIRATA, THEREBY UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL FOR ADMINSTRATIVE DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A 1,200-SQUARE-FOOT SECOND UNIT WITH AN APPROXIMATELY 317-SQUARE-FOOT ONE-CAR GARAGE AT 547 SYCAMORE ROAD, AS FILED UNDER CASE NO. P15-0010 WHEREAS, John and Cynthia Rocha applied for an Administrative Design Review application to construct a 1,200-square-foot second unit with an approximately 317-square-foot one-car garage located at 547 Sycamore Road; and WHEREAS, zoning for the property is PUD-A/MDR (Planned Unit Development— Agriculture/Medium Density Residential) District and all structures over 10-feet in height require Administrative Design Review approval pursuant to the Pleasanton Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, at a meeting on February 9, 2015, the Zoning Administrator, having considered all public testimony, relevant exhibits, and recommendations of City staff concerning this application, approved the application; and WHEREAS, within the time specified by the Pleasanton Municipal Code, Kimberly Connors submitted an appeal of the decision of the Zoning Administrator to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, at its meeting on March 25, 2015, the Planning Commission, having considered all public testimony, relevant exhibits, and recommendations of City staff concerning this application, denied an appeal of the application, thereby upholding the Zoning Administrators approval; and WHEREAS, within the time specified by the Pleasanton Municipal Code, Gary Hirata submitted an appeal of the decision of the Planning Commission to the City Council; and WHEREAS, at its regular meeting of May 5, 2015, the City Council received a report from the Director of Community Development, together with a copy of the staff report to the Planning Commission, regarding this matter; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a regular public hearing on May 5, 2015, at which time the appellant, and other members of the public were offered an opportunity to present evidence regarding the appeal.