My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENTS 02-04
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
101513
>
11 ATTACHMENTS 02-04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2013 4:21:34 PM
Creation date
10/9/2013 4:21:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/15/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT 2 <br /> DRAFT <br /> P13-1858, City of Pleasanton, East Pleasanton Specific Plan <br /> Consideration of a Draft Preferred Land Use and Circulation Plan for the <br /> purposes of preparing an Environmental Impact Report and a Draft Specific Plan. <br /> Brian Dolan stated that he, Wayne Rasmussen of Rasmussen Planning, Inc., Project <br /> Consultant, and Janice Stern would present the staff report. <br /> Mr. Dolan stated that the purpose of tonight's meeting is to get a recommendation from <br /> the Planning Commission on the work that the East Pleasanton Specific Plan Task <br /> Force has done to date. He indicated that the Task Force started in August 2012 and <br /> has met 11 times. He indicated that the Task Force has been going through a process <br /> and that it is at the point where the analysis of the alternatives that it has come up with <br /> in the Environmental Impact Report has to be continued in a more detailed way so it can <br /> dig a little deeper into some of the areas that it has been exploring to provide more <br /> information for the public and the Commission, and for the City Council as decision <br /> makers. <br /> Mr. Dolan stated that the Task Force has been exploring a number of alternatives, and <br /> at its last meeting, the Task Force was able to get a majority of its members to agree to <br /> one alternative which, for the purposes of CEQA, would be referred to as the Preferred <br /> Plan. He indicated that he would like to talk a little bit more about what that really <br /> means, but before doing that, he would like to go through the process and the <br /> immediate time line as the Task Force moves forward and how tonight fits into the <br /> overall process. <br /> Mr. Dolan then described the process: <br /> • The Task Force started with Background Information-Gathering, gathering data <br /> to try and educate the Task Force about the site and the various issues that <br /> everyone involved in the planning for this planning area is faced with. <br /> • The Task Force had an Opportunities and Constraints Analysis which really <br /> started to dig in at a fairly conceptual or broader level, exactly what are the things <br /> about this particular part of town that prevent opportunities for connectivity, view <br /> preservation, how much land is really being dealt with, and what are the potential <br /> connection points; all the things about the physical part of the land and the <br /> regulatory climate that limit those choices such as soil conditions, land <br /> ownership, property owner intentions, other regulatory things being some of the <br /> restrictions on the land because of its proximity to the airport and those kinds of <br /> things, and the railroad that is obviously a big constraint that the Commission <br /> considered the last time this was before the Commission. <br /> • The Task Force went through a Visioning exercise and was asked to try and <br /> identify what is it that it really wants to see out there. The Task Force spent a <br /> number of meetings talking about that and trying to narrow that focus as much as <br /> it could, dealing in this broader dialogue that it had. <br /> DRAFT EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, 9/25/2013 Page 1 of 28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.