My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENTS 02-04
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
101513
>
11 ATTACHMENTS 02-04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2013 4:21:34 PM
Creation date
10/9/2013 4:21:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/15/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br /> • The Task Force then dove into something that it has been dealing with for <br /> several meetings now: the evolution of a certain number of Plan Alternatives. <br /> This has really been an iterative process. It started with some alternatives, and <br /> each of them has evolved to a certain extent, some of them quite dramatically. <br /> The Task Force reached a point where, it felt for the most part like somewhere in <br /> these alternatives is the answer. The Task Force does not necessarily have the <br /> right one just yet, but every possibility of the outcome on a particular issue is <br /> probably represented within them. The people feel comfortable that the Task <br /> Force put some parentheses around the choices at least and they are on the <br /> table. <br /> • The specific task right now is to Select One Alternative to be kind of a frontrunner <br /> in the evaluation provided in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR). An EIR <br /> evaluates the so-called project, but a reasonable range of alternatives also need <br /> to be analyzed. Those alternatives have to meet the project objectives, and <br /> some of the environmental impacts that may be identified through that evaluation <br /> process have to be mitigated in some ways. The reason for the alternatives is <br /> not just for CEQA purposes; it is also because the City, as a community, is still <br /> trying to decide exactly what the land use pattern is and what the level of <br /> intensity of development out here is; hence, it needs to continue to drill down on <br /> the various choices that are being presented. <br /> • Once this alternative has been selected, the Environmental Review Process can <br /> be started, and at the same time, the smaller components of the plan, site <br /> development standards, and design guidelines will be further evolved. <br /> • Once these are done, the more normal, typical, public review process starts, <br /> back here at the Planning Commission and then on to the City Council with <br /> whatever number of public hearings that process requires. <br /> Mr. Dolan then presented the timeline: <br /> • In the short term, the Planning Commission will provide its input tonight on the <br /> Preferred Plan <br /> • The same question is then brought before the City Council on October 15th <br /> • Once a Preferred Plan has been identified, the Draft EIR can be started; the <br /> other Alternatives still need to be evaluated. The way CEQA works is that an <br /> environmental clearance for a certain amount of development is basically being <br /> provided. A policy decision can always come down to a lesser intensity from <br /> what has been evaluated. The choices are not being eliminated to some of the <br /> maybe less intense alternatives as it moves forward because a more intense <br /> alternative is included in the EIR analysis. The Planning Commission should not <br /> be concerned about this. There was a certain amount of concern by some of the <br /> DRAFT EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, 9/25/2013 Page 2 of 28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.