My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
ATTACHMENT 04
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
051711
>
BUDGET WORKSHOP
>
ATTACHMENT 04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2011 5:45:05 PM
Creation date
5/12/2011 5:43:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/17/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
04
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
THE CITY OF 04 <br /> CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP <br /> L€ASANTON© <br /> May 17, 2011 <br /> City Manager's Office <br /> TITLE: REVIEW UPDATED USER FEES FOR DEVELOPMENT RELATED SERVICES <br /> SUMMARY <br /> The last time the City conducted a comprehensive study of the user fees charged by the <br /> divisions within development services (i.e., building and safety, fire prevention, <br /> engineering and planning) was in 1992. At that time, due to the economic downturn in <br /> the real estate market, the City elected to not implement most of the fee increases. <br /> Therefore, the majority of the City's development related user fees have not been <br /> increased since the late 1980's. Since that time the consumer price index has increased <br /> by 59.28% and the engineering news record construction cost index (ENR-CCI) has <br /> increased 81.09%. As part of the streamlining of development services and the review <br /> of the City's cost of services in the General Fund, the City hired Public Resource <br /> Management (PRM) to prepare an analysis of the City's direct and indirect costs <br /> associated with the delivery of development related services. <br /> Based on the Study, the City recovers approximately 45% of the cost of development <br /> related services. Most cities in California, including Pleasanton, have a goal or policy of <br /> 100% cost recovery for development related services. The Study recommended that the <br /> City increase their cost recovery rate overall to 80% but it varies by individual fee. The <br /> permit volume has decreased substantially due to the economy. Therefore, the actual <br /> permit revenue increase from the implementation of the proposed fee increases will <br /> depend on development activity. Staff is estimating, based on projected permit volume <br /> for the next two years that the proposed fee increases will generate $350,000 and <br /> $700,000 of additional revenues each year respectively. <br /> RECOMMENDATION <br /> Receive the updated Master Fee Schedule for various development related services <br /> provided by individual divisions including building, fire prevention (Pleasanton only), <br /> planning and engineering. <br /> FINANCIAL STATEMENT <br /> Based upon 2007/08FY data for over 200 development related user fees, the study <br /> found that the City is expending $7,404,378 and recovering only $3,333,680 in revenue. <br /> The result is a subsidy of $4,070,698 by the General Fund of development related <br /> services. The recommended fee increases would reduce this subsidy by approximately <br /> $2,830,290 to a new subsidy level of approximately $1,240,409 based on development <br /> volume in 2007/08FY. If the Council adopts the recommended fees, the two year <br /> budget to be presented to Council in June 2011 for adoption will reflect the new fees <br /> and the reduced subsidy from the General Fund for these services. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.