My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
021511
>
11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2011 2:22:54 PM
Creation date
2/10/2011 2:20:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/15/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
11
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
THE CITY OF 11 <br /> mmi - "" CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT <br /> pL£ ASANTON, <br /> February 15, 2011 January 18, 2011 <br /> Community Development <br /> Planning Division <br /> TITLE: PAP -149, CONSIDER AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S <br /> APPROVAL FOR ADMINISTRATIVE DESIGN REVIEW TO CONSTRUCT <br /> AN APPROXIMATELY 80- SQUARE -FOOT SINGLE -STORY ADDITION <br /> AND AN APPROXIMATELY 1,038- SQUARE -FOOT SECOND -STORY <br /> ADDITION TO THE EXISTING RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 6114 HOMER <br /> COURT <br /> APPELLANTS: David and Stephanie Persin <br /> APPLICANTS /PROPERTY OWNERS: Rodney and Trina Lopez <br /> SUMMARY <br /> David and Stephanie Persin have filed the subject appeal of the Planning Commission's <br /> approval to allow an approximately 80 square foot single -story addition and an <br /> approximately 1,038 square foot second -story addition. The Persins contend that the <br /> project will result in reduced sunlight and reduced privacy, will negatively impact their <br /> view to the north, and that a two -story home is not consistent with the characteristics of <br /> the neighborhood. The correspondence from the appellants submitted with this appeal <br /> has been attached to this staff report. Subsequent to the Planning Commission meeting, <br /> two mediation meetings were held in an effort to facilitate an acceptable solution to <br /> concerned neighbors and the applicant. The mediation meetings resulted in further <br /> discussion about the project and possible mitigation measures, but did not result in a <br /> solution agreed by all parties. The appeal is therefore before the City Council. <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION <br /> Approved the application subject to conditions of approval by 3 -2 vote. <br /> RECOMMENDATION <br /> Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached draft resolution denying the <br /> appeal, thereby upholding the Planning Commission's approval of Case No. PADR- <br /> 2090, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit A. <br /> FINANCIAL STATEMENT <br /> Community Development fees apply for Planning entitlements and Building permits; <br /> therefore, no fiscal impact on the City is anticipated. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.