My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
021511
>
11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2011 2:22:54 PM
Creation date
2/10/2011 2:20:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/15/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
11
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BACKGROUND AND THE APPEAL <br /> The applicant requests approval to construct a first and second story addition to the <br /> existing one -story home Iccated at 6114 Homer Court. The scope consists of an <br /> addition to the first floor of approximately 80 square feet and a new second story of <br /> approximately 1,038 square feet. Figure 1 below provides a vicinity map and aerial <br /> photo of the subject site and its surrounding neighbors. <br /> rti <br /> tl <br /> Homer + '3'a . � FSIDFN € .� �' ` . 4 <br /> • - <br /> ui S RJL' <br /> .: 3:1 <br /> 2 <br /> l . <br /> N I 3 i • <br /> t '. 4 o <br /> / . ' <br /> • � � � � ',p <br /> • !, . I 1 <br /> D <br /> a 3 <br /> ' " kob^ ct Wist, k lT 1 . <br /> FIGURE 1: AERIAL MAP (GOGGLE MAPS) <br /> Please refer to the Planning Commission staff report dated August 25, 2010, for <br /> additional details regarding the project description and process leading to the Planning <br /> Commission hearing ( Attachment 7). The section labeled "Planning Commission <br /> Hearing" in this report describes the topics that were discussed at the Planning <br /> Commission hearing, and the section labeled as "Mediation" below describes the <br /> discussion and outcome as a result of two mediation meetings held after the Planning <br /> Commission hearing. The correspondence from the appellant party submitted with this <br /> appeal has been attached to this staff report as Attachment 2. Additional <br /> correspondence from the appellant party is attached to the Planning Commission staff <br /> report (Attachment 7) and was distributed during the Planning Commission hearing <br /> (Attachment 9). A letter from the applicants in response to the appeal has been attached <br /> to this staff report as Attachrnent 3. <br /> MEDIATION <br /> During the August 25, 2010, hearing, the Planning Commission asked the applicants <br /> and the appellants if they would consider mediation as a method to reach a suitable <br /> solution. The appellants stated that they would be interested in mediation, but the <br /> applicants declined participation since they felt it would not result in a solution that <br /> Page 2 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.