My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 82165
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
RES 82165
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/26/2012 2:45:41 PM
Creation date
3/1/2000 7:28:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
5/25/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~tEREAS, <br /> <br />~RIEREAS, <br /> <br />W]IEREAS, <br /> <br />WttEREAS, <br /> <br />~REAS, <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 82-165 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION APPROVING APPEAL OF WANDA ALDRICH TO A <br />DECISION OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTmeNT <br /> <br />at its meeting of April 14, 1982, the Board of <br />Adjustment approved case V-82-7, which granted a <br />variance from the off-street parking requirements <br />subject to three conditions; and <br /> <br />within the time specified by the Ordinance Code of <br />the City of Pleasanton, the applicant, Wanda <br />Aldrich, submitted an appeal to condition number 2 <br />of the Board of Adjustment approval, to the City <br />Clerk of the City of Pleasanton; and <br /> <br />at its meeting of May 25, 1982, the City Council <br />reviewed a report dated May 17, 1982 from the <br />Director of Planning and Community Development <br />together with copies of staff reports to the Board <br />of Adjustment regarding this matter; and <br /> <br />the City Council held a public hearing at which <br />time applicant and any other member of the public <br />was offered an opportunity to present evidence <br />regarding this appeal; and <br /> <br />after a review of the material presented, the City <br />Council makes the following findings: <br /> <br />That because there are special circumstances <br />having to do with the efficient utilization <br />of the subject property, the strict application <br />of the provisions of the Code would deprive <br />the property owner of privileges enjoyed by <br />other properties in the vicinity and under <br />identical zoning classification. <br /> <br />That because of the special circumstances <br />mentioned in paragraph (a) above, the granting <br />of the variance will not constitute a grant <br />of special privilege inconsistent with the <br />limitation on other properties classified in <br />the same zoning district. <br /> <br />That the granting of the variance will not be <br />detrimental to the public health, safety, or <br />welfare, or materially injurious to properties <br />or improvements in the vicinity. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.